Blanket-based structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional play structures, especially collapsible ones, lack structural integrity, leading to instability and potential injury during play, and they often require significant storage space, limiting their portability and versatility.

Innovation Solution

The system includes enclosure elements with attachment mechanisms, detachable corner straps, and weights to create and maintain stable blanket-based structures, anchoring them to environmental objects for enhanced rigidity and support, allowing for various configurations and improved portability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If play structures are made collapsible to reduce storage space, then storage efficiency is improved, but structural integrity deteriorates leading to instability and potential injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage footprintVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The play structure is divided into multiple modular panels that can be independently connected and disconnected. Each panel maintains its structural integrity while the overall structure can be assembled or disassembled by connecting panels through attachment mechanisms at corners and edges, resolving the contradiction between collapsibility and structural strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structure employs dynamic attachment mechanisms that allow panels to be easily connected and disconnected during play setup and storage. These mechanisms provide rigid connections when assembled but allow for quick disassembly, enabling the structure to transition between stable play configuration and compact storage state without compromising safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If play structures are made rigid to improve structural integrity, then stability is improved, but storage space requirement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidstorage footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the structure into separate rigid panels that maintain their structural integrity independently, the design allows each component to be strong and stable when assembled, while the segmented nature enables compact stacking and storage when disassembled, effectively resolving the volume-strength contradiction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If play structures are configured to assemble into pre-determined shapes to simplify assembly, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability deteriorates limiting configuration diversity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidconfiguration diversity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The attachment mechanisms are designed with universal compatibility across all panel types and connection points. Standardized connectors can attach to multiple locations (corners, mid-edges) and work with various panel configurations, enabling the same simple assembly process to create diverse structures such as forts, houses, tunnels, and open-play areas, thus achieving both ease of operation and adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10433662B2Blanket-based structures
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 OZMA LLC
  • US10433662B2 patent drawing
  • US10433662B2 patent drawing
  • US10433662B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and kits for assembling and/or modifying a blanket-based structure are disclosed. An exemplary system includes an enclosure element having one or more attachment mechanisms fixedly attached to the enclosure element and configured to detachably associate with one or more environmental structures. The exemplary system additionally includes a plurality of connection features, a plurality of complementary connection, and a plurality of eyelets disposed along the perimeter of the enclosure element. The exemplary system additionally includes one or more weights selectively attachable to the enclosure element at one or more of: the attachment mechanisms, the plurality of connection features, the plurality of complementary connection features, the plurality of eyelets, or combinations thereof.