Modular Bookbinding Feeding Apparatus for Parallel Batch Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional bookbinding feeding apparatuses are inefficient during machine stops and lack versatility to handle small production batches, leading to increased production times and costs, and are not scalable to adapt to changing workloads.

Innovation Solution

A modular bookbinding system with multiple feeding modules and a control device that enables alternate feeding from different sewing machines to maintain continuous feeding to perfect-binding machines, allowing for parallel processing of different production batches and easy scalability by adding modules as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a traditional single-type feeding apparatus is used, then the structure is simple, but the productivity drops significantly during machine stops and changeovers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidfeeding apparatus structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feeding apparatus is divided into multiple independent feeding modules (first feeding module, second feeding module, etc.), each capable of receiving book blocks from different sewing machines. This segmentation allows parallel operation and reduces downtime when one machine stops, directly improving productivity while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each feeding module is designed with universal capability to receive book blocks from any sewing machine and feed them to the perfect-binding machine. The modules can be selectively activated based on which sewing machines are operational, making the feeding apparatus adaptable to different production scenarios and reducing the impact of machine stops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of time

If manual transfer of book blocks is used, then the device complexity is low, but the loss of time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction timeVSAvoidfeeding automation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The feeding modules are equipped with sensors and automatic control systems that detect the presence of book blocks and activate the conveying mechanism automatically. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual intervention, reducing production time while maintaining reasonable automation levels that are manageable in practice.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that detect book block presence and machine status, providing feedback to the control system. This feedback mechanism enables automatic activation of feeding modules and adjusting of conveying speed, reducing production time through responsive automation without requiring overly complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional feeding apparatuses are used, then the device complexity is manageable, but the adaptability to different production batches is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction batch flexibilityVSAvoidfeeding system configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feeding apparatus allows dynamic selection and activation of different feeding modules based on production requirements. The system can adapt to different production batches by enabling or disabling specific modules, providing flexibility without requiring permanent reconfiguration or adding significant complexity to the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple feeding modules are pre-configured and ready for operation, allowing the system to quickly switch between different production batches by simply activating the appropriate module. This preliminary preparation enables rapid adaptability to changing production requirements without time-consuming reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If manual book block collection and transport is used, then the equipment investment is low, but the productivity decreases due to increased production times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebooks production rateVSAvoidfeeding operation automation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated feeding system is divided into independent, modular feeding units that can be implemented incrementally. Each module handles a specific function (receiving from sewing machine, conveying, feeding to perfect-binding machine), allowing the system to achieve high productivity through automation while keeping individual module complexity and cost manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The feeding modules automatically detect book blocks, activate conveying mechanisms, and coordinate with sewing and perfect-binding machines without manual intervention. This self-service automation significantly increases production rate while maintaining reasonable system complexity through straightforward sensor-actuator implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3305540B1Bookbinding system with alternative feeding of book blocks from different machines
Publication Date: 2020.08.12 MECCANOTECNICA SPA
  • EP3305540B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3305540B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3305540B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A bookbinding system (100;400) is proposed comprising a finishing machine (105) for finishing book blocks in succession, a plurality of supplying machines (110a-110c,410b) each for supplying part of the book blocks in succession, a feeding apparatus (115) for feeding the book blocks in succession from the supplying machines (110a-110c,410b) to the finishing machine (105), wherein the feeding apparatus (115) comprises one or more feeding modules (115a-115c) in sequence each comprising a conveyor (205a-205c) for conveying corresponding book blocks in succession having a plurality of entrances (220a-220c,225a-225c,425b-425c), comprising a main entrance (220a-220c) and one or more secondary entrances (225a-225c,425c-425b), for receiving corresponding book blocks in succession into an input section (210a-210c) of the conveyor (205a-205c) being common to the entrances (220a-220c,225a-225c, 425b-425c) and an exit (230a-230c) for providing the corresponding book blocks in succession, the main entrance (220b-220c) of each of the feeding modules (115b-115c) different from a first one (115a) of the feeding modules (115a-115c) being coupled with the exit (230a-230b) of a previous one (115a-115b) of the feeding modules (115-115c), the exit (230c) of a last one (115c) of the feeding modules (115c-115c) being coupled with the finishing machine (115) and each of supplying machines (110a-110c,410b) being coupled with a corresponding one of the secondary entrances (225a-225c,425b), and wherein the bookbinding system (100;400) comprises a control device (145) for enabling alternately, in each of the feeding modules (115a-115c), one of the entrances (220a-220c,225a-225c,425b-425c) and/or the exit (230a- 230c).