Modular Buoy Deployment System for Rapid UAV Network Extension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current buoy deployment methods are inefficient, costly, and time-consuming, lacking the ability to rapidly and effectively deploy buoys over long distances or in remote areas.

Innovation Solution

A modular buoy deployment system where buoys are assembled from multiple sections, allowing delivery via unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or other vehicles, enabling incremental deployment and networking, with a mooring system that uses buoyancy elements to anchor buoys efficiently, and providing power for UAVs and other vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a buoy is deployed as a single complete unit using traditional methods, then the buoy can be deployed reliably, but the deployment is time-consuming, costly, and cannot reach remote locations efficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidbuoy structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The buoy is divided into multiple modular sections that can be deployed independently. Each section contains essential functional components and can be assembled at the destination location, enabling incremental deployment via UAVs or other delivery vehicles rather than requiring complete pre-assembly and heavy-lift deployment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If buoy sections are made modular and deliverable by UAVs, then deployment cost and time are reduced, but the assembly process becomes more complex and requires autonomous or remote-controlled assembly mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment costVSAvoidassembly process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The buoy sections are designed with self-assembling capabilities through automated connection mechanisms. When sections are delivered to the destination, they automatically detect each other and form mechanical connections without requiring complex external assembly equipment or manual intervention, thereby reducing deployment cost while minimizing automation complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Connection interfaces and alignment mechanisms serve as intermediaries between buoy sections. These standardized interfaces enable automatic recognition, positioning, and mechanical coupling of sections, simplifying the assembly process while maintaining ease of manufacture through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Length of stationary object

If a buoy is deployed over long distances using incremental methods, then remote locations become accessible, but the tethering line must be deployed in sections and anchored reliably to the ocean floor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment distanceVSAvoidmooring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tethering line is divided into multiple sections with intermediate anchor points distributed along its length. Each section can be deployed and anchored independently, allowing the overall system to span long distances while maintaining reliability through distributed anchoring rather than relying on a single critical anchor point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Anchor points are pre-positioned along the tethering line before full deployment. This preliminary arrangement of anchor points ensures that as each tether section is deployed, it can be reliably secured at predetermined locations, maintaining system reliability throughout the incremental deployment process over long distances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Speed

If buoy sections are configured for UAV delivery, then rapid deployment is enabled, but the buoyancy and weighting must be precisely controlled to enable UAV carrying capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment rateVSAvoidbuoy section weight
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The buoy sections incorporate adjustable buoyancy and weight parameters through configurable ballast systems and buoyancy elements. This allows precise control of each section's weight-to-buoyancy ratio to match UAV carrying capacity, enabling rapid deployment while maintaining optimal weight characteristics for aerial delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid, efficient, and cost-effective deployment of buoys over vast distances, creating a network that extends UAV range and facilitates long-range delivery of items across geographic regions.

Implementation Method 1

Each buoyancy element may be configured to become negatively buoyant at a designated depth within a body of water such as sea water or fresh water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

As the bladder collapses, the density of the bladder increases, causing the bladder to become negatively buoyant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity change:

Implementation Method 3

the mooring element or weight (being negatively buoyant) begins to sink and pull the tethering line downward

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS11685479B2Incremental deployment of a buoy or buoy network
Publication Date: 2023.06.27 HADAL
  • US11685479B2 patent drawing
  • US11685479B2 patent drawing
  • US11685479B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mooring system including a plurality of connected floats and weights being positively buoyant on a water surface and being negatively buoyant at a depth below the water surface. The mooring system also includes a trigger mechanism arranged to reduce the buoyancy of a portion of the connected floats and weights from a being positively buoyant to negatively buoyant to cause the portion of the connected floats and weights to sink below the water surface where the trigger mechanism changes the buoyance of the portion of the connected floats and weights by either adding a weight to one end or separating the end from a buoyant element.