Modular Utility-Vehicle Cab Structure for Four-Door Flexibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cab structures for utility vehicles and working machinery lack flexibility in accommodating varying seat arrangements, door configurations, and integration of motor space, particularly failing to support four-door designs and efficient use of space.

Innovation Solution

A modular cab structure with interconnected longitudinal and transverse beams and pillars, formed by steel square tubes or bent sheet metal, allowing for symmetrical and adjustable configurations to accommodate different seat arrangements, door types, and integration of motor space through a motor tunnel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional cab structure with fixed beam and pillar configuration is used, then structural rigidity is maintained, but flexibility in accommodating varying seat arrangements and door configurations is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in seat arrangements and door configurationsVSAvoidstructural configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cab structure is divided into modular components including longitudinal beams, transverse beams, and pillars that can be selectively arranged. The longitudinal beams are positioned at different distances from the front wall to accommodate various seat configurations, while transverse beams connect these longitudinal elements to form adaptable door frames and structural supports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The beam and pillar structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: providing structural rigidity, forming door frames, supporting seat arrangements, and accommodating motor space integration. The same longitudinal beams serve both as structural supports and as guides for positioning seats at different configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the cab structure is designed for four-door configuration with extended longitudinal beams, then door accessibility is improved, but structural complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor accessibility and entry easeVSAvoidmanufacturing and assembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The four-door configuration is achieved by segmenting the side structure into multiple longitudinal beams (first, second, third longitudinal beams) that can be independently positioned. Each longitudinal beam forms part of a door frame, allowing four separate door openings while maintaining a unified structural approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The longitudinal beams are designed to extend beyond traditional positions, with the third longitudinal beam extending rearward to enable fourth door access. This dynamic extension of structural elements allows the cab to provide four-door accessibility without requiring a completely different structural platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Volume of moving object

If motor space is integrated into the cab structure, then space efficiency is improved, but the cab structure must accommodate variable motor tunnel positioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilization efficiencyVSAvoidaccommodation of motor tunnel positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The longitudinal beams serve dual purposes: as primary structural supports for the cab and as positioning references for the motor tunnel. The same beams that define the cab's structural framework also guide the positioning of motor components, eliminating the need for separate motor mounting structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The motor tunnel is nested within the cab structure, with motor components positioned in the space defined by the longitudinal and transverse beams. The motor space is integrated into the overall cab volume rather than being a separate addition, maximizing space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Strength

If welded joints are used to connect all beams and pillars, then structural strength is maximized, but manufacturing complexity and assembly time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strength and rigidityVSAvoidassembly speed and manufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The structure is segmented into standardized beam and pillar components that can be manufactured separately and then connected through welding. This segmentation allows for specialized manufacturing of each component while maintaining overall structural integrity through the welding connections at defined joint locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4624312A1Modular cab structure of a utility motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 TATRA TRUCKS
  • EP4624312A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4624312A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4624312A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In a cab structure of a utility motor vehicle are parallel to the bottom longitudinal beams (8, 9, 10) spaced from them planar symmetrically arranged inner longitudinal beams (7) in the shape of lying letter L, which are connected to the front under-window transverse beam (13) by the free end of the shorter arm of the L shape and to the bottom end of the rear inner pillar (6) by the rear end, wherein between the bottom end of the rear inner pillar (6), respective rear end of the inner longitudinal beam (7), on one side, and the bottom end of the last pillar (5), respective rear end of the bottom longitudinal beam (8, 9, 10), rear bottom transverse beam (16) is connected.