Modular Cable Protection System with Interlocking Segments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing protective solutions for power cables in pedestrian areas are labor-intensive to install, pose risks due to the use of nails and nail guns, and do not easily adapt to varying terrain or cable lengths, while also being difficult to remove without inadvertently disconnecting.

Innovation Solution

A modular cable protection system comprising interlocking cover members with recesses and posts that allow for secure, tool-free connection and articulation, enabling easy installation and removal without disconnecting from the cable, and featuring a quick-release mechanism to prevent accidental removal, made from durable materials like HDPE or metal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If wooden boards nailed together are used to protect cables, then protection is provided, but installation is labor intensive and poses safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable protectionVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The protective cover is divided into multiple modular sections that can be easily assembled and disassembled without tools. Each section can be independently handled and connected to form complete cable protection, eliminating the need for labor-intensive nailing operations while maintaining protective reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Connection elements serve as intermediaries between cover sections, providing tool-free attachment through interlocking mechanisms. These intermediaries enable quick assembly and disassembly while ensuring secure protection, replacing the harmful nailing process with safe mechanical coupling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional protective boxes are used, then cables are protected, but they do not adapt to varying terrain or cable lengths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable protectionVSAvoidterrain adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The protective system consists of multiple standardized modular sections that can be assembled in varying lengths and configurations to match different cable lengths and terrain conditions, providing both reliable protection and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular design allows the protective cover to be dynamically configured for different applications. Sections can be added or removed based on cable length requirements, and the system can adapt to various terrain conditions through flexible assembly arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If traditional protective boxes are used, then cables are protected, but they are difficult to remove without inadvertent disconnection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable protectionVSAvoidremoval ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Connection elements act as removable intermediaries that securely attach cover sections during use but can be easily detached when removal is needed. These intermediaries provide controlled attachment and release mechanisms that prevent inadvertent disconnection while enabling intentional removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The cover system incorporates self-locking or self-retaining features that maintain secure protection during normal use but allow easy release through simple user action. The design enables the system to maintain its own protective function while facilitating convenient removal when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If modular cover members with posts and recesses are used, then easy installation and removal is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidcover structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cover is segmented into standardized modules with repeating connection features. While each module has some complexity in its connection mechanism, the standardization across modules reduces overall system complexity by using identical components repeatedly rather than designing unique solutions for each connection point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The posts and recesses serve multiple functions: they provide mechanical connection, alignment, and structural support. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional specialized components, balancing the complexity of the connection mechanism with the elimination of separate alignment or support features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10014093B2Cable protection device and system
Publication Date: 2018.07.03 PECORARO MICHAEL
  • US10014093B2 patent drawing
  • US10014093B2 patent drawing
  • US10014093B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cover is provided for protecting cables. The cover includes a first cover member and a second cover member. The second cover member is configured to mate with the first cover member to define conduits that enclose and permit passage therethrough of one or more cables. Plural covers are couplable to form an articulating cover system operable to enclose a selected length of cable(s). The covers may be employed to protect hoses, pipes, ducts and the like.