Modular Cage Enclosure System for Data Center Flexibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data centers face challenges in efficiently reconfiguring customer cage enclosures to accommodate changing needs without the need for custom-sized panels that may become obsolete, leading to inefficiencies and waste.

Innovation Solution

A modular cage enclosure system based on a specific planning grid, using posts and cage panels with nominal widths that are modular increments, allowing for flexible configuration and reconfiguration to accommodate different customer requirements by adjusting the combination of panels and posts, thereby avoiding the need for custom manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If custom-sized cage enclosure panels are manufactured to meet specific customer needs, then the enclosure can be precisely fitted to customer requirements, but the panels become obsolete and unusable for future customer needs, leading to waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenclosure configuration flexibilityVSAvoidpanel obsolescence waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The cage enclosure system is divided into standardized modular panels that can be segmented and recombined in different configurations. Each panel has standardized dimensions that are multiples of a base module, allowing the same panel to be used in various enclosure sizes and layouts, preventing obsolescence and waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The standardized panels are designed to be universal components that can serve multiple functions and configurations. A single panel type can be used across different customer enclosures and reconfigured as needs change, making the panels universally applicable rather than custom-specific, thereby eliminating waste from obsolescence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If custom-sized panels are manufactured for each customer configuration, then precise fit is achieved, but the complexity of manufacturing and inventory management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenclosure panel fit precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing and inventory complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of creating custom panels for each configuration, the system changes the parameter approach by using standardized panel dimensions that are multiples of a base module. This allows precise fit to be achieved through modular arithmetic rather than custom manufacturing, simplifying production and inventory while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If the cage enclosure system uses fixed non-modular dimensions, then manufacturing is simpler, but the system cannot easily accommodate changing customer needs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidreconfiguration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces dynamics by making the enclosure configuration adaptable through standardized modular panels that can be easily added, removed, and reconfigured. The panels maintain simple standardized dimensions for easy manufacturing, while their modular nature enables dynamic reconfiguration to accommodate changing customer needs without complex custom manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10765031B1Modular cage enclosure system
Publication Date: 2020.09.01 EQUINIX INC
  • US10765031B1 patent drawing
  • US10765031B1 patent drawing
  • US10765031B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, a system includes a plurality of posts and a plurality of cage panels, wherein each of the cage panels is removably coupled to one or more of the plurality of posts, wherein a nominal width of each of the cage panels is congruent based on a modulus, wherein an actual width of each of the cage panels is equal to a difference between the nominal width of the cage panel and the width of one of the plurality of posts, and wherein any combination of a subset of the plurality of cage panels coupled in a common orientation to a subset of the plurality of posts has a combined width, between respective centers of end posts of the subset of the plurality of posts, that is congruent based on the modulus.