Modular Transport Cart With Segmented Ridges For Cabinet Subassembly Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for transporting and storing cabinet subassemblies such as door panels, windows, and face frames are prone to damage due to rattling and are not customizable or easy to use.

Innovation Solution

A modular, movable cart with a framework that includes a lower frame member and a side frame member, equipped with spacers made of fiberglass rods and ridges to keep subassemblies spaced apart and secure, allowing for easy adjustment and customization for different types of subassemblies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If cabinet subassemblies are transported stacked together, then transportation efficiency is improved, but damage risk increases due to stacking force and rubbing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation efficiencyVSAvoiddamage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The transport apparatus uses nested modular components where vertical supports fit within horizontal supports, and cabinet subassemblies are nested between protective barriers. This nesting approach allows multiple items to be transported together while maintaining protection through layered structural elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

Protective barriers act as intermediary elements between cabinet subassemblies during transport. These barriers prevent direct contact between subassemblies, eliminating rubbing and stacking damage while still allowing efficient vertical stacking for transportation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If existing storage racks are used for transporting doors and face frames, then storage capacity is improved, but reliability decreases due to lack of protection from rattling damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidprotection from rattling damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The transport apparatus incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable components that can adapt to different cargo configurations. The modular design allows the structure to dynamically adjust to secure various combinations of doors, face frames, and windows while maintaining protection against rattling during motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The protective barriers and support structures are segmented into modular sections that can be independently positioned and adjusted. This segmentation allows each section to provide localized protection against rattling while maintaining overall storage capacity for multiple cabinet components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Volume of stationary object

If existing transport solutions are designed for warehouse space saving, then storage density is improved, but ease of operation decreases due to bulky and complex design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarehouse space utilizationVSAvoidease of use
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The transport apparatus is divided into segmented modular components that can be easily assembled, disassembled, and reconfigured. This modular segmentation maintains compact storage density while dramatically improving ease of operation, allowing users to quickly adjust the structure for different cargo types without dealing with bulky monolithic designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design incorporates dynamic, reconfigurable elements that adapt to different transportation needs. This allows the apparatus to maintain high storage density when not in use while being easily operable and reconfigurable during active transportation tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If modular design is implemented for easy shipment, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The modular components are designed with universal connection interfaces and standardized dimensions that allow the same basic elements to serve multiple functions. This universality provides high adaptability for different cargo configurations while avoiding the complexity of designing entirely different components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250128747A1Transport apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 ROBINSON KYLE
  • US20250128747A1 patent drawing
  • US20250128747A1 patent drawing
  • US20250128747A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A transportation apparatus is provided. The apparatus includes a framework having a lower frame member and a side frame member, a flat bottom member supported on the lower frame member and has slots, and ridges, and a flat side member supported on the side frame member and includes slots and ridges. The apparatus further includes separators. The ridges of the flat bottom member and the flat side member are aligned on the same plane and include retaining spaces for slidably receiving and securing cabinet subassemblies (E.g. cabinet doors, windows, face frames). The cabinet subassemblies retained within the spaces are further separated by the separators preventing any damage to the cabinet subassemblies from rattling during the movement of the transportation apparatus.