Modular Ceiling Table with Detachable Formwork Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ceiling tables for concrete formwork are cumbersome to transport and inflexible, making them unsuitable for adaptable construction and incompatible with other formwork elements.

Innovation Solution

A ceiling table with a support skeleton and reversibly detachable formwork elements, allowing for flexible assembly and disassembly, enabling compact transportation and integration with other formwork components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If ceiling tables are designed with large formwork surfaces for quick concrete pouring, then productivity is improved, but the ceiling tables become cumbersome to transport and inflexible in use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcrete pouring speedVSAvoidtransportability and flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The ceiling table is divided into a modular system consisting of a lower frame, a support skeleton, and multiple detachable formwork elements. This segmentation allows the formwork elements to be removed when not needed, making the ceiling table compact for transport while maintaining large surface area capability when assembled for concrete pouring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connection between formwork elements and the support skeleton is designed to be reversibly detachable, allowing the ceiling table configuration to dynamically adapt between transport mode (compact, with fewer elements) and working mode (expanded, with all formwork elements attached).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If ceiling tables are designed as fixed units for structural stability, then reliability is improved, but they become incompatible with other formwork elements and inflexible in adaptation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidcompatibility and flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support skeleton is designed with universal connection features that can accommodate different types of formwork elements. The standardized interface allows various formwork elements to be attached to the same support skeleton, enabling one ceiling table to serve multiple functions and be compatible with different construction requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

By separating the stable support skeleton from the detachable formwork elements, the design maintains the reliability of the structural framework while allowing flexibility in the formwork configuration. The skeleton provides consistent structural support, while the elements can be adapted to different needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If ceiling tables are designed with fixed formwork elements for uniform construction, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the ceiling tables lose adaptability for different building structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniform implementationVSAvoidadaptability to building structures
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support skeleton provides standardized, precise connection points that ensure uniform implementation across different ceiling tables. Meanwhile, the detachable formwork elements can be selectively attached or removed at specific locations to adapt to local building structure requirements, such as creating cavities for concrete columns where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reversible detachment mechanism allows the formwork elements to be dynamically reconfigured based on local requirements while maintaining precise alignment through the standardized support skeleton connection system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If ceiling tables are designed as complete units for ease of use, then ease of operation is improved, but they become difficult to transport in compact manner

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidtransport volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The ceiling table is segmented into a permanent lower frame with support skeleton and detachable formwork elements. During transport, the formwork elements can be removed and stored separately, significantly reducing the volume of the ceiling table while maintaining ease of use when assembled at the construction site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The formwork elements can be stored in a nested or stacked configuration when not in use, maximizing space efficiency during transport while allowing quick assembly when needed at the construction site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS10907364B2Ceiling table and ceiling formwork comprising such a ceiling table
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 PERI GMBH
  • US10907364B2 patent drawing
  • US10907364B2 patent drawing
  • US10907364B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A ceiling table for a partial formwork of a concrete ceiling. The ceiling table has at least one formwork element, in particular multiple formwork elements, which can be assembled on a lower frame of the ceiling table in a nondestructive manner and which can be disassembled from the lower frame. The ceiling table has a support skeleton on which at least one formwork element, in particular multiple formwork elements, is/are arranged. The support skeleton can have multiple braces which can be connected together and separated from one another in a nondestructive manner. The support skeleton preferably has a pair of main supports, in particular parallel running main supports, on which a pair of edge supports and at least one central support that is arranged between the edge supports are arranged. The edge supports and the central support run preferably parallel to one another.