chair

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing chairs with transverse connection bars for stability incur high production costs, transport inefficiencies, and storage damage risks, limiting stackability and increasing economic and management burdens.

Innovation Solution

A chair design featuring two facing sidepieces connected by a single bar-type connection means, with engagement/disengagement mechanisms for the seat and backrest, allowing disassembly and stable assembly, and a covering element to protect against damage during storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If multiple transverse connection bars are used to firmly join the sides for stability, then the chair stability is improved, but the production cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechair stabilityVSAvoidnumber of connection bars
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The connection function is segmented between the L-shaped connection element (providing transverse connection) and the adjustable foot elements (providing longitudinal connection and stability). This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while reducing the total number of parts needed compared to traditional multi-bar designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The foot elements are designed to be adjustable in position along the sides, allowing the chair to adapt its stability configuration based on the surface conditions and stacking requirements. This dynamic adjustment capability replaces the need for multiple fixed connection bars.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If multiple transverse connection bars are used to firmly join the sides for stability, then the chair stability is improved, but the production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechair stabilityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The connection system is divided into modular components (L-shaped connection element, foot elements) that can be manufactured separately and assembled, reducing production complexity and cost compared to manufacturing multiple complete connection bars.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The L-shaped connection element serves multiple functions: it provides the primary transverse connection, supports the adjustable foot elements, and enables both stable configuration and compact stacking. This multi-functionality reduces the total part count and production cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Strength

If the chair is designed with traditional connection bars for stability, then the structural strength is improved, but the storage efficiency and transport efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidstorage space
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustable foot elements can be repositioned or removed to transform the chair from a stable operational configuration to a compact stacking configuration, enabling efficient storage and transport while maintaining structural strength when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The separable connection design allows the chair to be disassembled into smaller components for storage, reducing the volume occupied during transport and storage while maintaining full structural strength during use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Stability of the object's composition

If the chair is designed for stable assembly with multiple connection points, then the chair stability is improved, but the ease of assembly and disassembly deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechair stabilityVSAvoidease of assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The connection system is segmented into distinct modular components with standardized interfaces, allowing simple assembly and disassembly while maintaining stable connection when assembled. Each segment has a defined function and connection method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The adjustable foot elements can be easily positioned and secured at different locations, providing both ease of assembly and the ability to optimize stability based on specific usage conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3917361B1chair
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 FORNASARIG LUCA
  • EP3917361B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3917361B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3917361B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7a

AI summary

A chair comprising two facing and cooperating sidepieces (11), bar-type connection means to correctly and stably distance the two sidepieces (11), and, during use, a backrest (13) and a seat (12); the bar-type connection means, the backrest (13) and the seat (12) connect the two sidepieces (11) transversely in a stable manner.