Modular Clinical Analyzer Automation with Segmented Track

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional laboratory automation systems for clinical chemistry analyzers face bottlenecks due to their lack of intelligence and autonomy, leading to inefficiencies in sample handling, storage, and transportation, particularly in handling varied patient sample tube sizes and requiring redundant systems to prevent downtime.

Innovation Solution

The development of a modular, integrated automation system that includes a sample handler and vessel mover, capable of handling various sample tube sizes and providing redundant power systems to prevent downtime, along with advanced tracking and characterization systems to optimize sample flow and processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a friction-based track system is used to transport samples between stations, then sample transport is achieved, but the system can only move in one direction at a time and all samples move at the same speed, creating bottlenecks and reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The track system is divided into multiple independent powered track sections, each capable of moving carriers independently at different speeds and directions. This segmentation allows parallel transport operations and eliminates the single-direction constraint of friction-based tracks, thereby increasing overall sample throughput while maintaining transport capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If traditional lab automation systems are used, then sample handling is performed, but the systems lack intelligence and autonomy, requiring redundant systems to prevent downtime and increasing device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates predictive analytics and monitoring that detect potential failures before they occur, allowing proactive maintenance and carrier redistribution. This preliminary action prevents downtime without requiring redundant systems, as the intelligent prediction and response mechanisms maintain continuity of operation while avoiding the complexity of duplicate hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automation system possesses autonomous decision-making capabilities through its intelligent controller that can independently manage sample routing, track operations, and fault response. This self-service intelligence eliminates the need for redundant systems by enabling the single system to adapt and continue operation autonomously, reducing complexity while maintaining high availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If friction-based tracks with mechanical gates are used for sample diversion, then sample routing is achieved, but multiple mechanical gates are required to singulate and separate individual samples, stopping each sample multiple times and increasing loss of time

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces friction-based mechanical gate mechanisms with powered track sections that use controlled electromagnetic or electric motors to divert and accelerate carriers. This substitution eliminates the need for repeated mechanical stopping and gating, as carriers can be routed continuously through differential speed control and powered sections, maintaining ease of routing while dramatically reducing transit time losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If barcode reading and switching determination are performed at each gate, then sample identification is achieved, but the slow reading speed relative to switching time introduces hard singulations that cause all nearby samples to halt, increasing loss of time

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs sample identification and routing determination in advance using predictive analytics and pre-processing of sample information. By determining routing decisions before samples arrive at decision points, the system eliminates halts and maintains continuous flow, preserving both identification accuracy and processing rate through proactive decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intelligent controller as an intermediary that processes sample identification data and makes routing decisions independently of the physical sample flow. This mediator decouples the identification process from the transport speed, allowing accurate identification without causing halts, as the controller can process information at its own pace while samples continue moving through the powered track system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3488248B1Automated clinical analyzer system and method
Publication Date: 2025.05.21
  • EP3488248B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3488248B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3488248B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

An analyzer system for in vitro diagnostics includes a sample handler module having a robot arm that delivers samples from drawers into carriers on a linear synchronous motor automation track. Samples are delivered via the automation track to individual track sections associated with individual analyzer modules. Analyzer modules aspirate sample portions directly from the sample carriers and perform analysis thereon.