Modular Composite Spreader Structures for Offshore Lifting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional spreader structures used for offshore lifting of bulky loads are heavy, wasteful, and prone to corrosion and fatigue, requiring bespoke designs that are not suitable for repeated use due to limited crane capacity and harsh marine environments.

Innovation Solution

A modular spreader structure composed of elongate primary tubular elements made of composite material with axial couplers and node connectors, allowing for lightweight, adjustable, and reusable configurations that reduce weight and enhance durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If spreader structures are fabricated from steel to provide strength and durability, then the structural strength and reliability are improved, but the weight of the spreader structure increases significantly, reducing the effective lifting capacity of the crane

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweight of spreader structure
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials (specifically fibre-reinforced polymers) to fabricate spreader structures, combining the high strength-to-weight ratio benefits of composites with the structural requirements of lifting equipment. This resolves the contradiction by providing sufficient structural strength while significantly reducing weight compared to traditional steel construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The spreader structure is divided into multiple modular tubular elements that can be assembled together. Each element is made from composite material, and the modular design allows for optimized weight distribution while maintaining overall structural strength through proper joint design and material selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If bespoke spreader structures are designed and fabricated for each specialised lift to match the specific load requirements, then the adaptability to different load shapes and sizes is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and resource waste increase due to single-use disposal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to load configurationVSAvoiddesign and manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spreader structure is designed as a modular assembly of standardized tubular elements with various connectors. This segmentation allows flexible configuration to match different load shapes and sizes while using a limited set of standardized components, reducing design complexity and enabling reuse across multiple applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular design allows the spreader structure to be dynamically reconfigured for different lifting scenarios. Standardized elements can be assembled in various configurations to adapt to different load requirements, providing versatility without requiring complete custom design for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If spreader structures are used repeatedly in harsh marine environments subject to corrosion, fatigue, and temperature variations, then the productivity and cost-effectiveness are improved, but the reliability decreases due to degradation from environmental influences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepeated use capabilityVSAvoidresistance to environmental degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Fibre-reinforced polymer composite materials are used to construct the spreader structure, providing inherent resistance to corrosion, fatigue, and temperature variations associated with marine environments. These composite materials do not rust like steel and maintain structural integrity under cyclic loading and environmental exposure, enabling repeated use without significant degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If an oversized standard spreader frame is used for onshore lifts where large-capacity cranes are available, then the adaptability to large and bulky loads is improved, but the suitability for offshore lifting decreases due to limited crane capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to handle large loadsVSAvoidweight of spreader structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The spreader structure is designed as modular tubular elements that can be assembled in different configurations. For offshore applications, lighter-weight composite elements can be used with appropriate numbering to achieve the required lifting capacity without excessive weight. For onshore applications, additional elements can be combined to handle larger loads, providing adaptability across different operating contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design allows changing key parameters such as the number of tubular elements, their arrangement configuration, and material properties to optimize the spreader structure for different lifting scenarios. This enables the same modular system to be adapted for both offshore (weight-critical) and onshore (capacity-critical) applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4069622B1Spreader structures for lifting loads
Publication Date: 2024.02.07 SUBSEA 7 LTD
  • EP4069622B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4069622B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4069622B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A modular spreader structure (10) for use in offshore lifts comprises a plurality of elongate tubular elements (26, 22) made primarily of composite material. Primary tubular elements (26) each comprise an axial coupler formation (28) for end-to-end coupling with a complementary axial coupler formation of another primary tubular element, aligned on a common longitudinal axis. The adjoining primary tubular elements are interengageable by longitudinal overlap between male and female axial coupler formations. Secondary tubular elements (22) each comprise a node connector (30) that is configured for attachment to the structure at an orientation inclined relative to the common longitudinal axis of the primary tubular elements. In particular, the secondary tubular elements can be attached to an outer surface of one of the primary tubular elements.