Modular Composite Utility Pole With Interlocking Tapered Sections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wood utility poles are prone to infestation, rot, and decay, requiring maintenance, are heavy and difficult to handle, and pose hazards due to their solid structure, especially when located along roadways.

Innovation Solution

A modular composite utility pole system comprising tapered hollow tubes with angled filaments and built-up ledges, allowing for interlocking sections that can be easily assembled and repaired without field drilling, and featuring apertures for secure fastening, enabling efficient installation and replacement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If wood is used for utility poles, then the poles are strong and durable, but they are heavy and difficult to handle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepole strengthVSAvoidpole weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by constructing the utility pole from multiple layers of composite materials including outer protective layers, inner structural layers, and core materials. This composite structure provides the necessary strength and durability while significantly reducing the weight compared to solid wood poles, making them easier to handle and install.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the utility pole into multiple sections that can be manufactured separately and then assembled. Each section includes standardized connection features allowing modular assembly. This segmentation enables easier transportation and installation while maintaining the overall structural integrity of the pole.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If wood poles are made solid, then they provide structural integrity, but they pose hazards to motor vehicles and occupants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidimpact hazard
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs flexible shells and thin films by using layered composite structures that can deform under impact rather than shattering. The outer protective layers and inner structural layers work together to absorb impact energy, preventing the pole from shattering like solid wood while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the pole by transitioning from solid wood to a layered composite structure with specific thicknesses and material properties. This parameter change allows the pole to exhibit different mechanical behavior under impact, reducing hazard while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If wood poles are used, then they are cost-effective, but they require maintenance due to infestation and rot

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidresistance to infestation and rot
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials that inherently resist infestation and rot. The layered structure includes materials that do not decay or attract pests, eliminating the maintenance requirements associated with treated wood poles while remaining cost-effective through standardized manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a design where the pole structure is intended to be long-lasting without maintenance, replacing the need for periodic treatment and replacement of wood poles. The composite materials provide durable, maintenance-free service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Ease of operation

If modular composite sections are used, then installation and repair are easier, but the joint connection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidjoint connection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the pole into standardized sections with predetermined connection features. Each section includes matching joints and alignment features that simplify assembly. This segmentation reduces installation complexity by providing standardized interfaces rather than custom connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs universal connection features that work across all pole sections. The standardized joints and alignment features provide multi-functionality, serving both as structural connections and as alignment guides, thereby simplifying the overall installation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9745750B2Modular composite pole
Publication Date: 2017.08.29 THE INTELLI POLE CO LLC
  • US9745750B2 patent drawing
  • US9745750B2 patent drawing
  • US9745750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular composite utility pole has a plurality of sections, each with a tapered hollow tube having a plurality of plies, wherein a first end has a larger diameter than a second end, wherein each section is adapted to join at least one adjoining section at a joint wherein the first end of an upper section overlaps the second end of a lower section, the lower section having a ledge proximate to the second end of the lower section, with a fastener passing through the joint via apertures in the sections, and wherein, when the modular composite utility pole is erected, the joint is self-located by the joint features, and wherein substantially all vertical load is transferred between sections via the a surface of the second end of the upper section resting upon the ledge of the lower section. Also disclosed are individual sections and methods of making them.