Modular Storage Container Locking for Portable Cargo Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for loading and unloading vehicle cargo compartments require frequent user interaction and lack a scalable, high-portability storage solution that is cost-effective and suitable for various applications, including private, industrial, and warehouse settings.

Innovation Solution

A modular portable storage container system comprising interconnected sections with a structural frame, latch mechanism, and brake mechanism, designed to fit within vehicle cargo compartments, allowing for easy movement and secure storage while minimizing user interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual loading and unloading of cargo compartments is used, then user interaction is required, but this increases the number of times users must interact with cargo before, during, and after transit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interaction frequencyVSAvoidtime spent on loading and unloading
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The container system incorporates self-contained features including integrated casters for autonomous movement, brake mechanisms for self-stabilization, and latch mechanisms for self-securing. These features allow the container to perform loading, securing, and stabilization functions without requiring repeated user interaction during transit operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides the cargo transport function into separate components: the container sections for storage, casters for movement, brake mechanisms for stabilization, and latch mechanisms for securing. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, reducing the need for overall user intervention in the cargo handling process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a scalable storage system is designed for high portability, then it can be easily moved, but it may compromise on security and structural stability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveportabilityVSAvoidsecurity and structural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The container system employs dynamic features including movable casters for portability, retractable brake mechanisms for stabilization, and engageable latch mechanisms for security. These components can be activated or deactivated based on operational needs, allowing the system to transition between mobile and secured states while maintaining both portability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The container sections are constructed with structural frames that provide rigidity and strength while maintaining portability. The combination of frame structures with integrated functional components creates a composite system that achieves both high portability and structural stability without compromising security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Adaptability or versatility

If a modular container system with multiple mechanisms is created, then functionality is enhanced, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The container system uses universal components that perform multiple functions: the structural frames provide both structural support and mounting surfaces for other components; the casters enable movement while the integrated brakes provide stabilization; the latch mechanisms secure containers while also serving as attachment points. This multi-functionality reduces the total number of separate parts needed, simplifying manufacturing despite enhanced functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Stability of the object's composition

If brake mechanisms are added to prevent movement, then stability during transit is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability during transitVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The brake mechanisms are integrated with the container's existing structural frames and caster assemblies rather than being added as separate complex systems. The brakes are combined with the wheel assemblies, utilizing the same mounting structures and fastening mechanisms already present in the container design, thereby minimizing additional complexity while achieving stability during transit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11858724B2Modular portable storage container system
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 QT-SYST LLC
  • US11858724B2 patent drawing
  • US11858724B2 patent drawing
  • US11858724B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular portable storage container system includes a storage container having first and second sections. The first section defines a first partial volume of storage space and the second section defines a second partial volume of storage space. The system further includes a lock mechanism with a lock arm, lock handle, and pivot shaft defining an axis of rotation. The lock arm and handle are fixed for common rotation with the pivot shaft. The arm extends radially outward from the pivot shaft to a roller assembly. A lock track is disposed within the second section and extends from a fluted open portion to a closed end, with a continuous track portion disposed therebetween. The first and second sections are movable between at least closed and open positions. In the closed position, the roller assembly engages with the lock track and retains the first section in contact with the second portion.