Systems and methods of securing transport containers to attachment points

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for modular securing systems that can easily adapt to different types of transport containers and attachment points, ensuring secure attachment and reporting of attachment success, particularly to address the vulnerability of packages to theft and tampering during delivery and transit.

Innovation Solution

A securing system comprising an actuator, an attachment structure, and an electronic controller that authenticates the attachment point and securely attaches the transport container using various locking mechanisms such as threaded fasteners, pistons, or electromagnets, while transmitting status signals for verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electronic lockers are installed for package delivery, then package security is improved, but installation cost and complexity increase prohibitively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage securityVSAvoidinstallation cost and complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the securing function into two separate components: a portable container with locking mechanism and a stationary attachment point. This segmentation eliminates the need for expensive electronic locker installations while maintaining security, as the container itself becomes the secure unit that can be transported and attached anywhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The container includes its own actuator and electronic controller for locking and unlocking operations. The system performs self-service by using the container's own resources (integrated actuator, power source, controller) rather than requiring external electronic locker infrastructure, thereby reducing installation complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If packages are placed in secure sorting warehouses and transportation vehicles, then package security is improved, but access control complexity and vulnerability to internal threats increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackage securityVSAvoidaccess control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The securing function is segmented from the transportation infrastructure and embedded directly in the container. Each container operates as an independent secure unit with its own locking mechanism, eliminating reliance on centralized warehouse or vehicle access control systems that require managing credentials for multiple personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simple, inexpensive mechanical fasteners (cam locks, hasps, straps) combined with basic electronic actuators instead of complex access control systems. These simple locking mechanisms are sufficient for each container and can be easily replaced or reset, providing security without the complexity of managing authorized personnel access to secure facilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If modular securing systems with multiple locking mechanisms are used, then attachment reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple securing approaches by combining a mechanical fastening system (cam lock, hasp, or strap) with an electronic actuator that automates the locking process. This integration provides both the reliability of mechanical locking and the convenience of electronic control, while the electronic controller manages the complexity of coordinating these mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The attachment structure is designed with universal features that can accommodate different container types and attachment points. The electronic controller provides multi-functionality by managing authentication, actuator control, and status monitoring across various locking mechanism types, thereby standardizing the interface and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures secure attachment of transport containers to the correct points, reducing theft and tampering risks during delivery and transit, enabling rapid and efficient package delivery with automatic confirmation of secure attachment.

Implementation Method 1

The actuator may include a cam lock, a hasp, a strap, or an electromagnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnet: Electromagnet

Data Source

PatentUS11512501B2Systems and methods of securing transport containers to attachment points
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 MOTOGO LLC
  • US11512501B2 patent drawing
  • US11512501B2 patent drawing
  • US11512501B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Securing systems and methods of securing a transport container to an attachment point. In one embodiment, the securing system includes an actuator, an attachment structure, and an electronic controller. The attachment structure is dimensioned to complement the actuator. The electronic controller is operably coupled to the actuator for attaching and releasing the actuator to the attachment structure.