Modular Crossbar Spinal Prosthesis for Patient-Specific Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal prostheses lack modular designs that are configurable and adaptable to patient-specific disease states and anatomies, particularly for facet joint replacements, which limits their ability to restore biomechanical motion and align the spine properly, leading to incomplete pain relief and mobility issues.

Innovation Solution

A modular spinal prosthesis system with configurable and adaptable components, including cephalad and caudal prosthesis elements and crossbars, that can be selected and positioned to fit individual anatomical needs, providing adjustable features such as length, width, and orientation to accommodate various spinal anatomies and disease states, and can be secured using various fixation methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional non-modular spinal prostheses are used, then the device structure is simpler, but the adaptability to patient-specific anatomies and disease states is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to patient-specific anatomiesVSAvoidmodular component configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spinal prosthesis is divided into multiple modular components including articulating members, crossbar members, and fixation members that can be independently selected and configured. Each component can be customized in size, shape, and orientation to match patient-specific anatomies and disease states, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity by making the system modular rather than monolithic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular components are designed with universal interfaces and standardized connection mechanisms that allow the same basic component types to serve multiple functions across different patient populations and anatomical variations. This enables a finite set of modular components to address an infinite variety of patient-specific needs, improving adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If fixed-design prostheses are used, then the manufacturing process is simpler, but the ability to restore biomechanical motion is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiomechanical motion restorationVSAvoidcustomizable component selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis incorporates articulating members with spherical bearing surfaces and crossbar members with adjustable orientations that allow dynamic adaptation to physiological motion patterns. The modular design enables customization of the range of motion and mechanical properties to match patient-specific biomechanical requirements, improving reliability of motion restoration while maintaining manufacturability through standardized dynamic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If non-configurable prostheses are used, then the implantation procedure is faster, but the spinal alignment accuracy is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespinal alignment accuracyVSAvoidcomponent selection and positioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The modular components are pre-manufactured with precise geometries, standardized interfaces, and predetermined orientation features that enable accurate spinal alignment. The fixation members include pre-configured engagement surfaces and positioning elements that facilitate rapid and accurate component placement, reducing the time penalty associated with modular assembly while maintaining high alignment precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If traditional facet joint replacement methods are used, then the treatment approach is simpler, but the pain relief completeness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepain relief effectivenessVSAvoidmodular prosthesis system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The modular prosthesis system allows customization of each component's properties (size, shape, material, orientation) to match the specific pathological conditions and anatomical variations of each patient. This localized optimization of component characteristics enables more effective pain relief by addressing the unique requirements of each facet joint replacement case, justifying the increased system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7674293B2Crossbar spinal prosthesis having a modular design and related implantation methods
Publication Date: 2010.03.09 GLOBUS MEDICAL INC
  • US7674293B2 patent drawing
  • US7674293B2 patent drawing
  • US7674293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Modular spinal prosthesis having one of both of adaptable and configurable components is provided. The modular spinal prosthesis described herein provides an artificial articular configuration to replace damaged, worn or otherwise removed spinal facet elements.