Modular Damping Control for Auto-Tuned Suspension Upgrades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle suspension systems lack the ability to automatically adapt to different damping components and require manual adjustments, limiting their flexibility and efficiency, and do not offer cost-effective solutions for upgrading or modifying damping systems.

Innovation Solution

A modular electronic damping control system that identifies and automatically tunes the vehicle suspension based on the type of damping components at each wheel location, allowing for interchangeable dampers and automatic recognition, enabling cost savings and enhanced performance through user-selectable modes and sensor-driven adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustments are required for different damping components, then the system structure can be simpler, but the flexibility and efficiency are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically identifies the damping component type and adjusts suspension parameters without requiring manual intervention. The system self-configures by detecting component characteristics and autonomously optimizing performance across different terrains and operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes suspension parameters including damping coefficients, spring rates, and anti-roll bar stiffness based on detected component types and operating conditions. This allows the same physical hardware to adapt its characteristics through electronic control rather than mechanical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If manual adjustments are required for different damping components, then the device complexity can be reduced, but the efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors suspension performance and component characteristics, using sensor feedback to automatically adjust damping parameters. This closed-loop control enables real-time optimization of suspension efficiency without requiring manual intervention or complex mechanical adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment mechanisms with an electronic control system that uses sensors, processors, and actuators to automatically configure suspension parameters. This substitution of mechanical systems with electronic control improves efficiency while managing overall system complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual adjustments are required for different damping components, then the manufacturing cost can be lower, but the ability to adapt to different conditions is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to adaptVSAvoidcost-effective solutions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control system serves multiple functions including component identification, parameter optimization, terrain adaptation, and performance monitoring within a single integrated electronic control unit. This multi-functionality provides adaptability across different conditions without requiring separate mechanical adjustment mechanisms for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static, fixed suspension parameters to dynamic, continuously adjustable parameters that adapt in real-time to changing operating conditions. This dynamic capability is achieved through electronic control rather than complex mechanical systems, providing adaptability at a manageable cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12036835B2Modular electronic damping control
Publication Date: 2024.07.16 FOX FACTORY INC
  • US12036835B2 patent drawing
  • US12036835B2 patent drawing
  • US12036835B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular electronic damping control system is described and includes a damping component located at a vehicle suspension location. The modular electronic damping control system also includes a control system configured to control the damping component, and determine the type of damping component present. Also, the control system is configured to automatically tune a vehicle's suspension based on the type of damping component present, and automatically monitor the damping component and determine when a change has been made to the damping component so that the control system can then automatically re-tune the vehicle's suspension based on the change to the damping component.