Modular Decking System Using Light Gauge Steel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional decking systems made of timber are heavy, bulky, and require advanced expertise to design and assemble, leading to high costs, waste, and exclusion of DIY market participation.

Innovation Solution

A modular decking system constructed from light gauge steel, comprising extendable joists, beams, bearers, and foundation posts that can be pre-printed and assembled without cutting or drilling, allowing for adjustable and scalable deck configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional timber decking systems are used, then structural strength and stability are achieved, but weight and bulk increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from traditional timber to light gauge steel, fundamentally altering the weight-to-strength ratio. This material substitution enables the decking system to maintain structural integrity while significantly reducing weight, directly resolving the contradiction between strength and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs composite construction by combining light gauge steel framing members with decking panels, creating a hybrid structure that leverages the high strength-to-weight ratio of steel while incorporating specialized decking materials. This composite approach optimizes both structural performance and weight characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If traditional timber decking systems are used, then structural stability is achieved, but complexity of design and assembly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The decking system is divided into modular components including standardized light gauge steel joists, beams, and decking panels. This segmentation allows for pre-engineered connections and simplified assembly procedures, reducing on-site complexity while maintaining structural stability through systematic module integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates pre-drilled holes, pre-cut dimensions, and pre-assembled connector hardware in the manufactured components. This preliminary preparation of connection details eliminates the need for on-site drilling and complex cutting operations, significantly reducing assembly complexity while preserving structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If traditional timber decking systems are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but material waste and environmental impact increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The light gauge steel components are pre-cut to precise dimensions and pre-drilled with connection holes during manufacturing. This preliminary preparation eliminates on-site waste from cutting errors and ensures optimal material utilization, reducing material loss while maintaining structural integrity through precision-engineered components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The transition to light gauge steel enables thinner, more efficient material sections that achieve required structural performance with less material volume. This parameter change in material selection and section properties reduces overall material consumption and waste generation while preserving structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Force

If traditional timber decking systems are used, then load-bearing capacity is achieved, but ease of installation for DIY market deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidease of installation
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into lightweight, manageable modules that can be easily handled and positioned by DIY installers. The modular light gauge steel framework with pre-installed connectors allows for simple snap-together or screw-together assembly, dramatically improving ease of installation while maintaining load-bearing capacity through engineered connection details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The use of light gauge steel changes the weight parameter of individual components, making them sufficiently lightweight for DIY handling yet engineered to maintain adequate load-bearing capacity. This parameter optimization enables non-professionals to safely install the system while achieving structurally sound results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the creation of decks of any size without the need for cutting or drilling, reducing waste, cost, and environmental impact, while making it accessible for DIY installation.

Implementation Method 1

the beam recessed channel is configured to reduce friction between the second beam member and the first beam member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction reduction: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentUS20250129607A1Modular Decking System
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 DAVIS KIRK
  • US20250129607A1 patent drawing
  • US20250129607A1 patent drawing
  • US20250129607A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular decking system comprising at least one extendable joist, at least two extendable beams each connected to the at least one extendable joist, and at least one extendable bearer supporting the at least one extendable joist and the at least two extendable beams. The at least one extendable bearer is connected to the at least one extendable joist. Each extendable joist, each extendable beam, and each extendable bearer are extendable and retractable relative to one another.