Modular decking system with securement beams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current decking systems are not conducive to automation due to lack of movement restriction in the x-y-z planes, making it difficult for robots to reposition decks consistently, and existing securement beams are complex to place and store.

Innovation Solution

The modular decking system features adjustable shoring beams with low friction blocks that engage securement tracks on vertical posts, allowing independent adjustment of securement beams and modular decks, with locking mechanisms for controlled movement and storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If current decking systems allow free movement in x-y-z planes, then flexibility of deck positioning is improved, but automation difficulty increases due to lack of movement restriction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck positioning flexibilityVSAvoidrobot repositioning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the movement freedom by introducing separate track systems for different movement types: securement tracks restrict lateral movement while allowing vertical adjustment, and deck tracks enable controlled repositioning. This segmentation allows robots to operate within constrained, predictable paths while maintaining overall system flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The decking system implements dynamic adjustability where decks can be repositioned vertically along securement tracks during operation, and securement beams can be independently adjusted along dedicated tracks. This dynamic capability enables the system to adapt to different cargo configurations while providing consistent movement constraints for automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If manual locking and unlocking of decking is required, then deck movement control is improved, but user safety deteriorates due to hazards in automated environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck movement controlVSAvoiduser safety hazard
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates self-locking mechanisms where decks automatically engage with securement beams through gravity and friction-based locking features. The low-friction blocks and locking mechanisms enable automatic engagement and disengagement without requiring manual intervention, eliminating safety hazards while maintaining operational control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual locking operations are replaced with automated mechanical systems including motorized actuators, pneumatic cylinders, or robotic end-effectors that interface with the track and locking mechanisms. This substitution eliminates direct human contact with moving parts while preserving precise movement control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If removable beams are used to restrict freight movement, then cargo securement is improved, but system complexity increases due to accumulation and storage requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo securement effectivenessVSAvoidbeam accumulation and storage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The securement beams serve multiple functions: they provide cargo restraint, define deck boundaries, and act as adjustable support structures. The same beams that securement cargo also serve as the positioning references for deck placement, eliminating the need for separate accumulation and storage systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from managing beam quantity through accumulation to managing beam position through dedicated tracks. Each securement beam has its own track system, transforming the problem from storing multiple beams to precisely positioning individual beams along extended track paths, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Manufacturing precision

If securement beams with six degrees of freedoms are used, then positioning precision is improved, but placement complexity increases requiring separate location of both ends

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam placement precisionVSAvoidplacement operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The six-degree-of-freedom positioning capability is segmented into independent track systems: one track handles longitudinal positioning, another handles lateral positioning, and vertical adjustment is provided through separate mechanisms. This segmentation allows robots to position each end of securement beams independently along constrained paths, simplifying the control algorithm while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Dedicated securement tracks serve as intermediaries between the robot and the securement beams. The tracks provide physical guidance and constraints that reduce the robot's positioning task from six degrees of freedom to one or two degrees of freedom, while still achieving precise beam placement through the combined track-robot system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution simplifies the adjustment and storage of decking systems, enhancing automation by restricting movement to upward and downward directions, improving robot efficiency and user safety, and reducing the complexity of securement beam placement.

Implementation Method 1

adjustable shoring beam in which the ends can adjusted to different heights along one or more securement tracks on a vertical post. The adjustable shoring beam engages the securement tracks on the vertical posts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS12127674B2Modular decking system with securement beams
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 INNOVATIVE LOGISTICS LLC
  • US12127674B2 patent drawing
  • US12127674B2 patent drawing
  • US12127674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The ends of the adjustable shoring beam can be adjusted to different heights along one or more securement tracks on a vertical post. The adjustable shoring beam engages the securement tracks on the vertical posts and each end is independently adjustable in one degree of freedom. Modular deck tracks on the vertical posts, adjacent to the securement tracks, allow for the engagement of a modular deck with a vertical post. The modular deck and securement beam are able to be moved independently past each other on the vertical posts by a user or an autonomous machine.