Modular Radiographic Detector Architecture for Component Upgrades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital radiographic detectors are manufactured with fixed architectures, leading to obsolescence, high service costs, and inability to upgrade or update components, resulting in prolonged development times and increased costs due to the need to replace entire detectors when individual components fail.

Innovation Solution

A modular digital radiographic detector design with interchangeable components, allowing for easier upgrades and integration of the latest technologies by swapping components within a common frame, reducing manufacturing costs and enabling rapid technological evolution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If detectors are manufactured with fixed architecture, then manufacturing and validation processes are simplified, but the detectors become obsolete quickly and cannot be upgraded with newer technologies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidupgradeability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The detector is divided into separate modular components including imaging panels, electronics modules, and processing units that can be independently manufactured, tested, and replaced. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized separately while maintaining overall system functionality, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and upgradeability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detector architecture transitions from a static fixed design to a dynamic modular system where components can be selectively upgraded, replaced, or reconfigured based on technological advancements and operational needs, enabling continuous adaptation without complete system replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If entire detectors are replaced when components fail, then reliability is maintained, but service costs increase and environmental waste is generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector reliabilityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Specific components such as imaging panels, batteries, or electronics modules can be extracted and replaced individually without removing the entire detector system. This extraction capability maintains system reliability by replacing only failed components while reducing material waste from discarding functional parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The modular design enables selective discarding of only the failed component while recovering and retaining all other functional components. Used modules can be refurbished, repaired, or recycled, significantly reducing waste compared to disposing of entire detectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Device complexity

If components are integrated into fixed architecture, then device complexity is reduced, but development time from design to final product delivery increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector architecture complexityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Modular components are designed, tested, and validated independently in advance before final system integration. This preliminary action on individual modules accelerates the overall development process by parallelizing design and testing activities, reducing the time from design to final product delivery despite increased architectural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If latest technologies are integrated into existing detectors, then performance is improved, but manufacturing costs and validation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector performanceVSAvoidvalidation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

New technologies are integrated into specific modular components rather than the entire detector system. This segmentation isolates validation requirements to individual modules, reducing overall validation complexity while still achieving performance improvements through technological advancements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250355123A1Modular detector architecture
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 CARESTREAM HEALTH INC
  • US20250355123A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355123A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355123A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular digital radiographic detector is constructed to have a housing for receiving and securing detector components. One or more removable and interchangeable modular detector components maybe swapped with an identical component or a replacement version of the removed modular detector component. Compartmental openings are formed in the housing and include electrical connectors for integrating one or more replacement detector components into the detector's communication system.