Modular Document Interface for Jurisdictional Compliance Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large corporations face challenges in managing and creating documents that require compliance with varying jurisdictional regulations, as existing methods are inefficient and prone to errors due to the complexity of conditional logic and the need for frequent updates across multiple jurisdictions.

Innovation Solution

A web-based system that utilizes a graphical user interface to manage and track modules of documents, allowing users to select and modify modules based on specific jurisdictional requirements, incorporating gap analysis to ensure compliance with local laws and regulations, and maintaining a centralized database for version control and access management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized database is used to manage document modules across multiple jurisdictions, then document consistency and compliance tracking are improved, but system complexity and user interface complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The document is divided into modular components (modules) that can be independently managed, selected, and modified. Each module represents a specific portion of the document that can be updated separately to comply with different jurisdictional requirements, reducing the complexity of managing entire documents across multiple regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized database serves multiple functions: storing document modules, tracking version history, managing user access rights, monitoring changes, and ensuring compliance across different jurisdictions. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems while improving document consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If granular control over document components is implemented through module selection, then document customization for specific jurisdictions is improved, but the time required to create and modify documents increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument customizationVSAvoiddocument creation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Document modules are pre-created, pre-approved, and pre-organized in the centralized database before needed. Users can directly select from pre-prepared modules rather than creating documents from scratch, significantly reducing document creation time while maintaining customization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows dynamic assembly of documents by selecting different modules based on jurisdictional requirements. Modules can be added, removed, or replaced dynamically during the document creation process, enabling customization without requiring complete redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If frequent updates to document modules are performed to reflect changing regulations, then compliance accuracy is improved, but the frequency of changes and potential errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance accuracyVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system tracks all changes to modules and maintains version history. Users can review change logs, compare versions, and verify that updates accurately reflect regulatory changes. This feedback mechanism ensures compliance accuracy while allowing verification to prevent errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized database stores approved master versions of modules that serve as reference standards. When updates are made, the system compares changes against established versions and maintains audit trails, providing a cushion against errors by allowing verification and rollback if needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Reliability

If user access and modification rights are tightly controlled in the centralized database, then data security and compliance are improved, but ease of operation and user accessibility decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoiduser accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements different access rights and operational capabilities for different users based on their roles and jurisdictions. Users can be granted specific permissions to view, edit, or approve particular modules without affecting the entire system, balancing security with ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized database acts as an intermediary between users and document modules, managing authentication and authorization automatically. Users interact with the system through a user-friendly interface that handles security credentials and access rights transparently, maintaining both security and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10650060B2Graphical user interface for tracking data access and data changes in a centralized database
Publication Date: 2020.05.12 HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO
  • US10650060B2 patent drawing
  • US10650060B2 patent drawing
  • US10650060B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments provide a method, including: receiving a request to create a new document identifying an intended state of use for the new document; accessing, from a web-based data repository, a plurality of modules for the document type; populating the new document using the plurality of modules; accessing at least one modifiable module having default parameters intended for use within a section of the new document and modifiable for the intended state of use; modifying the at least one modifiable module based upon indication of a gap between the at least one modifiable module and the intended state of use, wherein the gap is determined based on the laws and regulations of the selected intended state of use, wherein the modifying comprises incorporating the information related to the gap into the modifiable module; and finalizing the new document by inserting the modified module into the section of the new document.