Modular Double-Spindle Textile Machine With Independent Drives

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multi-station textile machines are inflexible and costly, making them unsuitable for producing smaller batches, and they suffer from reduced efficiency and high maintenance costs due to central drive systems, which can lead to significant downtime and increased expenses when malfunctions occur.

Innovation Solution

A multi-station textile machine comprising double-spindle units with a centrally arranged carrier and hollow profile support structure, allowing for adjustable feet, integrated bobbin transport, and modular winding devices with independent controls, enabling flexible configuration and reduced component variation, along with optional suction devices for heat extraction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a central drive system is used to reduce manufacturing costs, then manufacturing cost decreases, but machine flexibility and operational independence deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidmachine flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The machine is divided into independent double-spindle units, each with its own drive system. This segmentation allows each unit to operate autonomously, improving flexibility while maintaining cost-effectiveness through modular construction. The frame is also segmented into modular sections that can be independently assembled and configured.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine design allows dynamic reconfiguration of working stations and spindles. The modular frame sections can be arranged in different configurations, and spindles can be independently positioned and adjusted, enabling the machine to adapt to different production requirements without complete reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If a central drive system is used to simplify control, then device complexity decreases, but operational efficiency during malfunctions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidoperational efficiency during malfunctions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into independent control units for each double-spindle unit. When a malfunction occurs in one unit, other units can continue operating independently, maintaining productivity. Each control unit manages its own spindles and working stations without being affected by failures in other units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each double-spindle unit is self-sufficient with its own drive and control systems. The units can independently monitor and manage their own operations, and can continue functioning autonomously even when other units require maintenance or experience failures, ensuring continuous production capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If individual drives and controls are assigned to each spindle to increase flexibility, then machine flexibility improves, but manufacturing cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob independenceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Two spindles are combined into a single double-spindle unit with a shared carrier and common support structure. This merging reduces the number of completely independent units needed, lowering manufacturing costs while still maintaining independent control and operation of each spindle through separate drives and controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The double-spindle units and modular frame sections are designed with universal interfaces and standardized components that can be configured for different working stations and production requirements. This multi-functionality allows the same basic structure to serve multiple purposes, reducing the need for specialized components and lowering overall manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Area of stationary object

If a compact machine frame is used to reduce footprint, then area occupied decreases, but stability and load-bearing capacity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine footprintVSAvoidframe stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The frame structure utilizes vertical dimension for support and stability through adjustable feet and vertical positioning mechanisms. By distributing loads vertically and using the height of the machine structure, stability is achieved without requiring a larger horizontal footprint, allowing compact design while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances machine flexibility, reduces production costs, and improves stability and efficiency by allowing for easy adaptation of workstation dimensions, autonomous operation, and effective heat management, minimizing downtime and operational expenses.

Implementation Method 1

the design of the vertical part of the carrier as a hollow profile with at least one opening makes it possible in a simple manner to equip the multi-point textile machine with a suction device if required. With such a suction device, the warm air produced in the area of the work stations during production can be sucked off

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Data Source

PatentEP2573222B1Multi-point textile machine, in particular double-thread yarn or cabling machine
Publication Date: 2020.02.26 SAURER TECH GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2573222B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2573222B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2573222B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The textile machine has a double-spindle unit that is provided with a centrally-arranged-carrier (2). A transverse beam of the carrier is extended horizontally to the double-spindle unit and is provided with an adjustable portion to support on the ground. A hollow profile of the carrier is extended perpendicularly to the transverse beam. A winding device (3) is attached with the hollow profile for receiving a coil removal device.