Modular EEG Cap with Elastic Drive System for Scalp Contact

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing EEG caps face challenges such as discomfort due to excessive weight and electromagnetic interference, difficulty in achieving tight scalp contact, and accuracy degradation due to electrode resistance and hair interference, necessitating a novel design that addresses these issues.

Innovation Solution

An assembled, downward-pressing, multifunctional EEG cap with modular constituent blocks that adjust to fit different head sizes, featuring a drive system for relative movement of electrodes, a hair-moving portion to accommodate hair, and integrated features like a VR face shield and ultraviolet lamp for improved comfort and signal accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If electromagnets are used to attach electrodes to the scalp, then electrode contact is improved, but weight increases and electromagnetic interference occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode contact accuracyVSAvoidEEG cap weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the electromagnet component from the EEG cap system. Instead of using magnetic attachment, the invention employs a mechanical retention system where the cap itself is made of elastic material that can be stretched over the head and secured with a simple retention mechanism, eliminating the heavy electromagnetic components while maintaining electrode contact through the elastic pressure of the cap material itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the electromagnetic attachment system with a purely mechanical elastic retention system. The cap is made of elastic material that uses mechanical elasticity to press the electrodes against the scalp, eliminating the need for electromagnetic fields and associated heavy components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If electromagnets are used to attach electrodes to the scalp, then electrode contact is improved, but electromagnetic interference degrades measurement accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode contact accuracyVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the electromagnet component from the EEG cap system. Instead of using magnetic attachment, the invention employs a mechanical retention system where the cap itself is made of elastic material that can be stretched over the head and secured with a simple retention mechanism, eliminating the heavy electromagnetic components while maintaining electrode contact through the elastic pressure of the cap material itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the electromagnetic attachment system with a purely mechanical elastic retention system. The cap is made of elastic material that uses mechanical elasticity to press the electrodes against the scalp, eliminating the need for electromagnetic fields and associated harmful interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If a single power source is used to pull electrodes toward the scalp, then structure is simplified, but electrode contact consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower source quantityVSAvoidelectrode contact consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the cap into multiple independent elastic segments or zones, each capable of applying its own retention force. This segmentation allows different regions of the cap to independently adjust to the contours of the scalp, ensuring consistent electrode contact across all measurement points without requiring a complex centralized power and actuation system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic elastic material that can adapt its shape and pressure distribution in real-time as the cap is worn. The elastic material naturally adjusts to individual head contours and maintains optimal contact pressure, eliminating the need for active controlled actuation systems while ensuring consistent electrode contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If the cap is made tightly to ensure good electrode contact, then measurement accuracy is improved, but patient comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode contact accuracyVSAvoidpatient comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs elastic material with optimized elasticity properties that provide sufficient retention force for accurate electrode contact while maintaining comfort. The material's elastic characteristics allow it to stretch over the head and apply gentle, distributed pressure rather than tight, concentrated force, balancing measurement accuracy with patient comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the elastic properties and physical parameters of the cap material to achieve the right balance between retention force and comfort. By carefully selecting material elasticity, cap thickness, and construction parameters, the system achieves adequate electrode contact without causing discomfort to the patient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12144646B2Assembled, downward-pressing, multifunctional EEG cap
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 XUANWU HOSPITAL OF CAPITAL UNIV OF MEDICAL SCI
  • US12144646B2 patent drawing
  • US12144646B2 patent drawing
  • US12144646B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an assembled, downward-pressing, multifunctional electroencephalogram (EEG) cap, at least comprising: a cap body, configured to be worn on a head of a patient, and formed by a plurality of constituent blocks, wherein each of the constituent blocks comprises a first unit and a second unit that carry extracranial electrodes for detecting EEG signals from corresponding areas of the head of the patient, in which the first unit and the second unit are configured to perform relative movements and thereby change their relative positions, the first unit and the second unit being shaped to fit a curved surface of the head of the patient; the first unit of the constituent block being movably connected to the second unit by means of a drive system provided between at least a part of the first unit and a part of the second unit, wherein the extracranial electrodes located on the first unit and on the second unit are configured to at least follow the relative movements between the first unit and the second unit in a first direction so as to move toward and/or away from an EEG measuring area on the head of the patient.