Modular Elbow Prosthesis Fixation for Capitellum Fractures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current elbow prostheses face challenges in reconstructing fractures around the capitellum and coronoid, particularly due to difficult exposure, inconsistent fracture fragment size, and poor bone quality, leading to suboptimal outcomes such as nonunion, instability, and accelerated arthritis.

Innovation Solution

A modular elbow prosthesis system comprising a capitellar implant with an articulating head and stem, and a coronoid implant with a body and stem, both designed for modular coupling and featuring interlocking geometries and bone screws for enhanced fixation, allowing for customizable geometry to match patient-specific needs and facilitating bony ingrowth for improved stability and fixation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional linked or unlinked elbow prostheses are used, then the basic elbow replacement function is achieved, but the reconstruction of fractures around the capitellum and coronoid is suboptimal due to difficult exposure, inconsistent fracture fragment size, and poor bone quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture reconstruction outcomeVSAvoidprosthesis structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The prosthesis is divided into separate modular components: a humeral component with capitellar and coronoid portions, and a separate ulnar component. This segmentation allows each fragment to be independently sized and configured to match specific fracture patterns, improving reconstruction reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the humeral component are designed with distinct geometries and fixation features tailored to specific anatomical regions - the capitellar portion addresses lateral column fractures while the coronoid portion addresses medial column fractures. This local customization optimizes each region's performance without requiring complete redesign of the entire prosthesis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If bone screws are used for fixation of fracture fragments, then fixation strength is improved, but the risk of nonunion and instability remains due to poor bone quality and inconsistent fracture fragment size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation strengthVSAvoidunion stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Bone screws are integrated within the prosthesis structure itself - countersinks and counters bores are formed in the capitellar and coronoid portions to receive screws that secure fracture fragments directly to the prosthetic body. This nesting ensures fixation elements are precisely positioned and protected, improving both initial fixation strength and long-term union stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The prosthesis design includes pre-formed countersinks, counters bores, and receptacles for bone screws and fracture fragments before implantation. This preliminary preparation of fixation pathways ensures proper alignment and engagement of fracture fragments with the prosthesis, reducing the risk of malpositioning and improving union reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If a modular design with selectable geometry is implemented, then adaptability to varying fracture patterns is improved, but the device complexity and number of components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture pattern accommodationVSAvoidcomponent variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The humeral component is designed as a multi-functional element that can address multiple fracture patterns through its integrated capitellar and coronoid portions. The standardized interface between the humeral and ulnar components allows the same basic design to serve multiple clinical indications, improving adaptability without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2400928B1Elbow prosthesis
Publication Date: 2016.04.20 BIOMET MFG LLC
  • EP2400928B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1E
  • EP2400928B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2F
  • EP2400928B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3E

AI summary

An elbow prosthesis constructed in accordance to one example of the present teachings can include a capitellar implant having an articulating head and a stem. The articulating head can have a first articulating surface positioned generally between a lateral side and a medial side. A passage can extend through the articulating head from the lateral side to the medial side. The articulating head can define a counterbore formed at the lateral side and that is concentric with the passage. According to other features, the elbow prosthesis can include a coronoid implant that has a body and a stem. The body can have a superior articulating surface that includes a central ridge and an anterior buttress. The central ridge can be configured to accommodate articulation with a trochlea in an implanted position.