Modular Electrothermal Wing Ice Protection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electro-thermal wing de-icing systems for aircraft are inflexible, unreliable, and inefficient, failing to provide effective ice protection for modern aircraft.

Innovation Solution

A scalable electro-thermal wing ice protection system comprising power control modules (PCMs) and a master control unit (MCU) that can be stacked and mounted in rack systems, providing organized power distribution and efficient heating to prevent ice buildup, with features like solid-state proportional control, fault isolation, and redundant components for reliability and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple individual heating elements are spaced about the wing surface, then ice protection coverage is provided, but system flexibility and reliability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidsystem flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The wing de-icing system is divided into multiple independent heating zones, each controlled by a separate power control module (PCM). This segmentation allows the system to be configured flexibly for different aircraft types while maintaining high reliability through modular redundancy. Each zone can be independently controlled and replaced without affecting other zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs solid-state proportional control that dynamically adjusts power delivery to each heating zone based on real-time conditions. The master control unit (MCU) and PCMs continuously monitor and adjust heating parameters, enabling the system to adapt to varying flight conditions, ice accumulation rates, and aircraft configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If heating elements are installed in fixed configurations, then manufacturing is simplified, but system efficiency and adaptability to different aircraft types deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The power control modules and master control unit are designed as universal, aircraft-type-agnostic components that can be configured for different wing sizes and shapes. The modular rack-mounted architecture allows the same basic components to serve multiple aircraft models, improving system efficiency while maintaining ease of manufacture through standardized parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows adjustment of heating parameters such as power level, temperature thresholds, and zone activation sequences to optimize performance for different aircraft configurations. This parameter flexibility enables efficient ice protection across various aircraft types without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If power distribution is centralized, then system complexity is reduced, but reliability and fault isolation capability are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault isolation capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Power distribution is segmented into multiple independent zones, each managed by its own PCM that receives commands from the MCU. This distributed architecture isolates faults to specific zones or modules, preventing system-wide failures while maintaining manageable complexity through standardized modular components and hierarchical control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system offers flexible, reliable, and efficient ice protection by delivering precise power to heating zones, ensuring high availability and preventing asymmetrical heating, thus enhancing aircraft safety and reducing flight delays.

Implementation Method 1

Typical wing de-icing systems include multiple individual heating elements spaced about the wing surface of the aircraft. These heating elements are typically powered by electricity.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS8820683B2Electrothermal wing ice protection system
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 ULTRA ELECTRONICS TCS
  • US8820683B2 patent drawing
  • US8820683B2 patent drawing
  • US8820683B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electro-thermal wing ice protection solution controller for managing and controlling electrical power generated to heat and de-ice the wing of an aircraft. The system is comprised of a number of power control modules (PCMs) and at least one master control unit (MCU). These elements can be stacked together and mounted into rack systems in order to provide scalable organized power distribution for a wing de-icing and ice protection system.