Modular Energy-Dissipation Net With Rotation Reversing Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional passive flexible protection systems for slope geological disasters, such as rockfall and collapse, face challenges including complex anchoring construction, low energy dissipation efficiency, and high maintenance requirements due to strong system integrity and long slip paths of support ropes, leading to inadequate protection and difficulty in expansion or replacement of units.

Innovation Solution

An expandable modular energy-dissipation protection net system featuring support columns with rotation reversing devices, endless support ropes, and independent energy dissipaters, allowing for reduced anchoring points, high energy dissipation efficiency, and modular design for easy assembly and maintenance, with adjustable energy dissipaters and self-balancing constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If traditional passive flexible protection system uses linearly-arranged support ropes with multiple anchoring points, then system integrity is strong, but anchoring construction becomes heavy and difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integrityVSAvoidanchoring construction
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The protection system is divided into independent modular units, each with its own support columns and energy dissipaters. This segmentation reduces the need for extensive anchoring while maintaining system integrity through modular connectivity, directly addressing the contradiction between system stability and construction ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If traditional system uses support ropes with long slip path and multiple inter-column interception units, then system coverage is comprehensive, but energy dissipation efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection coverageVSAvoidenergy dissipation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Energy dissipation is segmented into independent units with localized energy dissipaters positioned at strategic points. This eliminates the need for long slip paths while maintaining comprehensive protection coverage, as each module independently dissipates energy within its designated area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Energy dissipaters act as intermediaries between the metal net panels and support columns, providing localized energy absorption without requiring long rope slip paths. This mediator approach maintains protection coverage while significantly improving energy dissipation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If traditional passive protection system has strong system integrity with complex connections, then protection is comprehensive, but maintenance and renewal workload increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidmaintenance workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into independent modular units that can be individually maintained or replaced. This segmentation maintains comprehensive protection effectiveness while dramatically reducing maintenance workload, as only affected modules need attention rather than the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Modular units are designed for easy replacement when worn or damaged. Individual modules can be quickly removed and replaced without affecting the rest of the system, reducing maintenance workload while maintaining overall protection reliability through continuous operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Stability of the object's composition

If traditional system uses fixed configuration with many anchoring points, then system stability is high, but expandability and adaptability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidexpandability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The modular unit design with standardized interfaces enables easy expansion and adaptation to different slope configurations and protection requirements. System stability is maintained through proven modular connections while adaptability increases significantly, allowing the system to be expanded or reconfigured as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular units are designed with universal connections and standardized components that can be applied to various slope types and protection scenarios. This universality maintains system stability through consistent design principles while greatly enhancing expandability and adaptability to different site requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves improved energy dissipation capacity, reduced construction difficulty, and enhanced protection effectiveness by shortening the sliding path of support ropes, enabling independent operation and replacement of units, and allowing for arbitrary expansion of the protection system.

Implementation Method 1

support columns each provided at each of its two ends with a first horizontal longitudinal rotation reversing device on the left side, a second horizontal longitudinal rotation reversing device on the right side and a transverse rotation reversing device on the bottom; a transverse endless support rope wound on the transverse rotation reversing devices located at two ends of the support column; a longitudinal endless support rope wound on adjacent first and second horizontal longitudinal rotation reversing devices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPulley: Pulley

Implementation Method 2

first energy dissipaters connected to the side B; second energy dissipaters connected to the stabilizing and anchoring steel wire rope

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy dissipation: Damping

Implementation Method 3

the support ropes has a long slip path, and the protection units between columns has many interference factors on the slip of the support ropes, resulting in low energy dissipation efficiency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11414821B2Expandable modular energy-dissipation protection net unit group and protection net system formed by the same
Publication Date: 2022.08.16 SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIV
  • US11414821B2 patent drawing
  • US11414821B2 patent drawing
  • US11414821B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An expandable modular energy-dissipation protection net unit group includes support columns each provided at each of two ends of each support column with a first horizontal longitudinal rotation reversing device on the left side, a second horizontal longitudinal rotation reversing device on the right side and a transverse rotation reversing device on the bottom; a transverse endless support rope, a longitudinal endless support rope and connectors. The transverse endless support rope is wound on the transverse rotation reversing device. The longitudinal endless support rope is wound on the first horizontal longitudinal rotation reversing device and the second horizontal longitudinal rotation reversing device adjacent. A metal net panel is tied by the plurality of connecting members and hung on the transverse endless support rope and the longitudinal endless support rope.