Modular EV Battery Pack Control with Peer-to-Peer Cell Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electric vehicle (EV) systems lack advanced battery management, motor control, and charging technologies, leading to inefficient energy storage, reduced reliability, limited battery life, and suboptimal performance due to the use of outdated mechanical drivetrain components and simplistic electronic controls.

Innovation Solution

A unified modular battery pack system with a cascaded architecture, incorporating a networked low voltage converter/controller, embedded ultra-capacitor, and advanced battery management system, which enables peer-to-peer communication and individual cell monitoring, replacing traditional charging systems, battery management modules, and motor controllers, and integrates with in-wheel motors to optimize energy storage and motor control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional battery management systems with simple embedded control are used, then device complexity is reduced, but battery reliability and performance are deteriorated due to inability to monitor individual cell health and adjust power draw

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery reliabilityVSAvoidbattery management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The battery management system is segmented into modular units, each managing specific battery cells or modules. Each module includes its own controller, sensors, and protection circuitry, allowing independent monitoring and control of individual cells while maintaining overall system reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary monitoring and assessment of cell health, temperature, and state of charge before critical failures occur. Predictive algorithms analyze trends in real-time data to anticipate potential issues and take preventive actions, improving reliability without requiring overly complex real-time intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional mechanical drivetrain components are used, then adaptability to different motor designs is reduced, but device complexity is lowered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to motor designsVSAvoiddrivetrain complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical drivetrain components (clutches, transmissions, differentials) with direct-drive electric motor configurations and electronic control systems. This substitution enables greater adaptability to different motor designs while reducing mechanical complexity through elimination of moving mechanical parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The drivetrain system is designed with universal mounting interfaces and standardized electrical connections that accommodate various motor types and configurations. The electronic control architecture provides multi-functional capabilities including motor control, regenerative braking, and energy management, replacing multiple specialized mechanical systems with a single adaptable platform.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Use of energy by moving object

If simplistic electronic controls are used, then ease of operation is improved, but energy efficiency is deteriorated due to inability to optimize power distribution and thermal management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates multiple sensors monitoring power consumption, thermal conditions, and battery state across the drivetrain. Real-time feedback from these sensors enables dynamic optimization of power distribution, thermal management, and energy recovery strategies, significantly improving energy efficiency without requiring overly complex user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system operates autonomously to optimize energy efficiency, automatically adjusting power distribution, thermal management parameters, and regenerative braking thresholds based on real-time conditions. This self-service capability improves energy efficiency without adding complexity to user operation, as the system manages optimization internally without user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11840150B2Systems and methods for power management and control
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 TAE TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11840150B2 patent drawing
  • US11840150B2 patent drawing
  • US11840150B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods directed to improved battery management, motor control, energy storage and battery charging. The systems and methods enable vehicle electrification and provides a paradigm changing platform that enables integration of battery management, charging and motor controls with means to manage regenerative braking, traction and handling. In embodiments, systems and methods are directed to a unified modular battery pack system having a cascaded architecture comprising an integrated combination of a networked low voltage converter/controller with peer-to-peer communication capability, embedded ultra-capacitor or other secondary energy storage element, battery management system and serially connected set of individual cells as the fundamental building block.