Modular Explosion-Proof Assembly with Tool-Operated Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing explosion-proof assemblies for electrical devices are often expensive, cumbersome, and not adaptable for use in varying hazardous environments, particularly failing to meet requirements for abnormal conditions and multiple device compatibility.

Innovation Solution

A modular explosion-proof assembly comprising a waterproof enclosure for computing devices, with a tool-operated retention mechanism that prevents combustion and exposure to hazardous environments, allowing for use in Class I and Class II areas, including Division 2 conditions, and compatibility with different devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional explosion-proof enclosures are used for electrical devices in hazardous areas, then safety requirements are met, but the devices become expensive and cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety in hazardous areasVSAvoidenclosure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The enclosure is divided into a first portion and a second portion that can be separated from each other. The first portion houses the electrical device while the second portion can be attached or removed. This segmentation allows the enclosure to meet explosion-proof requirements when assembled while maintaining simplicity and adaptability when portions are separated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The enclosure is designed to accommodate multiple different electrical devices through a universal interface system. The first portion contains standardized mounting structures and connection points that can interface with various devices, making the same enclosure suitable for different applications in hazardous areas without requiring device-specific custom enclosures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If explosion-proof enclosures are designed for specific hazardous area classifications, then safety certification is achieved, but the enclosures cannot be used in other hazardous environments or abnormal conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety certificationVSAvoidhazardous environment compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The enclosure transitions from a static, fixed-design structure to a dynamic, adaptable system. The separable first and second portions can be configured differently based on the hazardous environment, and the tool-operated retention mechanism allows for secure assembly in certified configurations while enabling reconfiguration for different classification requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The enclosure system allows changing of operational parameters by reconfiguring which portions are assembled together. Different combinations of the first and second portions can be used to meet different hazardous area classification requirements (Class I, Class II, Division 1, Division 2, ATEX Zone 1, ATEX Zone 2), enabling the same basic enclosure design to be certified for multiple environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If enclosures are permanently coupled to electrical devices, then protection is ensured, but multiple devices cannot share the same enclosure and functionality is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection integrityVSAvoiddevice compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The permanent coupling is replaced with a separable connection system consisting of a first portion and a second portion. The tool-operated retention mechanism provides secure, reliable attachment when assembled, ensuring protection integrity, while allowing the portions to be separated for device replacement or reconfiguration, enabling multiple devices to share the same enclosure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If complex retention mechanisms are used to secure enclosures, then safety is maintained, but user operation becomes difficult and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenclosure securityVSAvoiduser friendliness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

A tool-operated retention mechanism serves as an intermediary between the user and the enclosure assembly. The mechanism uses a simple tool interface that users can operate easily, while the underlying retention system provides secure, reliable attachment. The tool acts as a mediator that simplifies the user interaction while maintaining the integrity and security of the enclosure connection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9867438B2Explosion proof assembly
Publication Date: 2018.01.16 XCIEL INC
  • US9867438B2 patent drawing
  • US9867438B2 patent drawing
  • US9867438B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An explosion proof assembly includes a case configured to receive a waterproof assembly having a waterproof enclosure housing a computing device, wherein the case is configured to prevent combustion within an internal cavity of the waterproof enclosure. The assembly may include a flap coupled to the case to retain the computing device in the case, wherein the flap includes a tool-operated retention member configured to retain the flap in a closed position, wherein the retention member of the case is configured to be unfastened using a tool, and wherein the case and the tool-operated retention member are configured to prevent combustion within an internal cavity of the computing device.