Modular Multi-Sensor Fire Detector Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fire detectors are cumbersome and costly to install and maintain, particularly in hazardous environments, and require multiple detectors to reliably detect fire hazards, leading to complex system coordination and high installation efforts.

Innovation Solution

A modular multi-sensor fire detector design where sensor heads are spatially separated from the evaluation unit, allowing for compact, flexible installation and maintenance, with the evaluation unit processing signals remotely and sending alarms independently of sensor types, reducing system complexity and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If multiple sensors are permanently installed in a single housing, then the detector structure is compact and integrated, but if one sensor fails the entire detector must be replaced and monitoring cannot take place during this period

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector structureVSAvoidcontinuous monitoring capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The detector is divided into separate sensor units and a central evaluation unit. Each sensor can be independently replaced without affecting the others, allowing continuous monitoring operation. The segmentation enables modular replacement of failed components while maintaining system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If fire detectors are installed in or very close to the danger zone, then hazard detection is reliable, but the detectors must meet stringent safety and environmental requirements increasing construction and approval effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection reliabilityVSAvoidconstruction and approval effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor units are separated from the evaluation unit, allowing sensors to be installed in the danger zone while the evaluation unit can be positioned in a less restrictive environment. This segmentation reduces the construction and approval burden on the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation unit is designed with universal interfaces that can connect to different types of sensor units. This multi-functionality allows the same evaluation unit to work with various sensor configurations, simplifying approval processes and reducing construction effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If several fire detectors are necessary to reliably determine the occurrence of a dangerous event, then detection reliability increases, but the installation effort and coordination with the alarm signal receiving device increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedangerous event detection reliabilityVSAvoidsystem coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple sensor units are merged into a single detector system with a common evaluation unit. The evaluation unit coordinates the signals from multiple sensors locally, eliminating the need for complex coordination with the alarm signal receiving device and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Extent of automation

If the alarm signal receiving device performs the analysis of signals from multiple detectors, then centralized control is maintained, but the device requires a significant amount of processing effort and the installation effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidinstallation and processing effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The signal analysis function is segmented from the alarm signal receiving device and transferred to local evaluation units at each detector. This distributed intelligence reduces the processing burden on the central receiving device and simplifies installation while maintaining centralized control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each evaluation unit performs self-service by autonomously analyzing signals from its connected sensors and determining when alarm conditions are met. This eliminates the need for complex centralized signal analysis and reduces installation and processing effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3417433B1Modular multi-sensor fire- and/or spark detector
Publication Date: 2023.09.06 MINIMAX GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3417433B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3417433B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2c
  • EP3417433B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a modular multi-sensor fire detector (300). According to the invention, the detector (300) has an evaluation unit (200) and a number of sensor heads (100) spatially remote from the evaluation unit (200) and signal-connected to the latter (200). The evaluation unit (200) can be signal-connected to a spatially remote alarm signal receiver (301) such that the evaluation unit (200), the sensor heads (100) and the alarm signal receiver (301) are not integrated into a common housing or into a number of housings assembled together. The invention further relates to a fire detection system comprising a fire detector of this type.