Modular Flag System with Tool-Free Tab-and-Slot Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional flag systems are limited by the need for tools to remove and replace flags, are difficult to expand, and require complete unit replacement when flags are damaged or need updating, leading to increased costs and time consumption.

Innovation Solution

A modular flag system comprising a channeled base, U-shaped inserts, and flags with tabs, allowing easy assembly and replacement without tools, and enabling expansion by adding additional channeled bases, with options for adhesive or magnetic attachment to walls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional flag systems use a fixed bar attached to a base, then the structure is stable and simple, but the flags cannot be easily removed or exchanged and require tools for replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEase of flag replacementVSAvoidStructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flag system is divided into separate modular components: a base unit, individual flags with tabs, and a retention mechanism. This segmentation allows flags to be independently removed and exchanged without affecting the overall structure, enabling tool-free replacement while maintaining structural stability through the modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flag retention mechanism transitions from a fixed, static attachment to a dynamic system where flags can be easily inserted and removed. The tab-and-slot design with retention features allows the system to adapt between secured and released states, enabling easy flag exchange without requiring structural changes or tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional flag systems have a predefined number of flags, then the unit structure is simple, but the system cannot be expanded without purchasing another unit

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSystem expandabilityVSAvoidModular complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base unit is designed with multiple identical slots and retention mechanisms, allowing it to accommodate varying numbers of flags. This universal design enables the same base structure to support different configurations and expansions, making the system adaptable to different needs without requiring additional specialized components or units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The base unit is pre-configured with multiple slots and retention features ready for use. This preliminary preparation allows flags to be easily added or removed as needed, enabling flexible expansion or reduction of the flag count without requiring structural modifications or additional assembly steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of repair

If flags are permanently attached to the base unit, then the structure is simple and stable, but complete replacement is required when flags need updating, increasing expense and time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveFlag maintenance easeVSAvoidMaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the flag and base into separate replaceable components with standardized interfaces. This allows individual flags to be maintained or replaced independently without affecting the base unit or other flags, enabling quick maintenance operations that reduce both time and expense compared to complete unit replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design allows worn or outdated flags to be easily removed and discarded while retaining the base unit and functional components. This selective replacement approach recovers valuable components (base, retention mechanisms) and only replaces the consumable flags, reducing overall maintenance time and expense.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Reliability

If tools are required to loosen the bar from the base for flag replacement, then the attachment is secure, but the replacement process becomes time-consuming and difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAttachment securityVSAvoidFlag replacement ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical fastening mechanisms (screws, bolts requiring tools) with a simplified tab-and-slot retention system. This substitution maintains secure attachment through geometric interlocking and retention features while enabling tool-free installation and removal, simultaneously achieving reliability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The tab-and-slot design with retention features creates a self-securing mechanism that automatically holds flags in place without requiring external fasteners or tools. The system serves itself by using the flag tabs to engage with and secure themselves in the slots, providing both secure attachment and easy tool-free removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9472130B2Flag system
Publication Date: 2016.10.18 SHARPE GARY L
  • US9472130B2 patent drawing
  • US9472130B2 patent drawing
  • US9472130B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flag system having a modular construction is disclosed that includes a plurality of inserts and a plurality of flags. The flags are insertable through channels in the inserts and are able to rotate therein. The inserts are then slid into the open ends of channels in a channeled base that is fixed to a wall or other solid structure.