Modular Floating Dock Segmentation and Light-Through Decking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional over-the-water docks face issues with rapid deterioration due to water and weather exposure, high maintenance costs, and adverse impacts on shoreline marine life from inadequate light penetration, as well as complex and costly repair processes.

Innovation Solution

A modular floating dock system utilizing polyethylene floats with fixed longitudinal walers, splicers, and a wave attenuator, allowing for efficient assembly and disassembly without requiring complete dock dismantling, and incorporating light-through decking for reduced environmental impact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If conventional floating docks use longitudinal wooden walers held against captive floats by transverse tension bars, then the dock structure can be assembled, but the tension bars tend to loosen over time due to temperature and humidity acting on the walers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedock structure stabilityVSAvoidtension bar retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The dock is divided into modular sections with independent floats and walers. Each module can be assembled and disassembled separately, allowing localized repairs without affecting the entire structure. This segmentation reduces the propagation of deterioration and maintains structural integrity over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dock transitions from a static, fixed structure to a dynamic, modular system that can be reconfigured. The walers are designed to be removable and repositionable, allowing adaptation to changing environmental conditions and structural needs, thereby preventing loosening and maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If conventional floating docks use solid decking, then structural strength is maintained, but light penetration to submerged vegetation and shallow dwelling creatures is blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecking structural strengthVSAvoidlight blockage to marine life
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The decking is designed with varying properties in different locations. Solid decking is provided where structural strength is critical, while open or translucent sections are provided where light penetration is needed for marine life. This local differentiation allows simultaneous satisfaction of strength requirements and environmental considerations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The decking incorporates porous or translucent materials in specific areas that allow light to pass through while maintaining sufficient structural strength. This enables the deck to serve both structural and environmental functions, permitting light penetration to submerged vegetation and shallow dwelling creatures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Ease of repair

If float repair or replacement requires complete dock dismantling, then the entire dock can be serviced, but significant cost and repair time are incurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefloat replacement accessibilityVSAvoidrepair time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The dock is segmented into modular sections with independent floats that can be accessed and replaced without dismantling the entire structure. This modular architecture allows targeted repair of individual floats or sections, significantly reducing repair time and cost while maintaining the ability to service the complete dock system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If over-the-water docks are made of timber fixed to sunken pilings, then initial construction is simple, but rapid deterioration occurs due to constant exposure to water and weather

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial construction simplicityVSAvoiddock service life
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The dock employs composite materials including polyethylene floats, treated woods, and corrosion-resistant fasteners that work together to provide both initial construction simplicity and long-term durability. The polyethylene floats resist water and weather deterioration, while the treated wood walers and decks provide structural integrity, extending the overall service life of the dock system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The materials and construction methods are selected and modified based on environmental parameters such as water exposure, weather conditions, and marine life considerations. This parameter-driven selection ensures that each component is optimized for its specific function and environmental conditions, preventing rapid deterioration and extending service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modular design reduces maintenance costs, extends dock service life, and minimizes environmental impact by allowing for efficient repair and assembly, while providing effective light penetration and improved wave resistance.

Implementation Method 1

A modular floating marine dock includes a polyethylene float that defines a top surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

A wave attenuator includes a frame attached to an outboard side of the fascia and an interior truss attached to the frame and a bottom surface of the float

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWave attenuation: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS8091500B2Over-the-water dock
Publication Date: 2012.01.10 MARINE FLOATS CORP
  • US8091500B2 patent drawing
  • US8091500B2 patent drawing
  • US8091500B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An over-the-water dock includes a plurality of modular floating docks adjacently positioned. Each modular floating dock includes a float and a plurality of walers fixedly attaches to the float and walers include at least one outer waler and an inner waler. One or more crossbeams transversely attach to the at least one outer waler of one of the modular floating docks and the at least one outer waler of another of the modular floating docks.