Modular Flood Barrier With Gripping Structures

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flood mitigation solutions, such as sandbags and temporary structures, are labor-intensive, costly, and prone to failure when exposed to high water levels or debris, while permanent structures are not feasible in all areas due to periodic flooding.

Innovation Solution

A modular flood barrier system comprising interconnected plastic units with gripping structures on the bottom and end-to-end connections, which can be filled with ballast to sink into the ground and resist displacement, providing durable and reusable protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sand bags are used for temporary flood protection, then some degree of protection from flood waters is provided, but they are highly labor intensive and time consuming to construct

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from flood watersVSAvoidlabor intensive and time consuming to construct
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The flood barrier is divided into multiple modular panels that can be independently assembled. Each panel is a self-contained unit with standardized dimensions and connection features, allowing rapid assembly without extensive labor. The modular design enables parallel construction of multiple sections simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier panels are pre-fabricated with integrated connection mechanisms and gripping structures before deployment. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for on-site construction of connection details, significantly reducing assembly time and labor requirements while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If sand bags are used for temporary flood protection, then some degree of protection from flood waters is provided, but they must be disposed of after the flood danger has passed which is costly and creates a disposal problem

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from flood watersVSAvoiddisposal cost and environmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier panels are designed as reusable components that can be easily disassembled and stored after flood events. The durable materials and robust connection systems allow the panels to be recovered intact and deployed in subsequent flooding events, eliminating disposal costs and reducing environmental impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier system transitions from single-use sand bags to multi-use engineered panels, changing the durability and reusability parameters. This parameter change enables the same protective structure to serve multiple flood events, converting a consumable resource into a sustainable asset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If sand bag walls are used for flood protection, then they provide some barrier function, but they tend to topple over if the flood water crests at or above the height of such walls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier functionVSAvoidresistance to toppling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier panels incorporate gripping structures that extend vertically beyond the main barrier height. These gripping elements engage with the flood water and debris in the vertical dimension, providing additional resistance to toppling forces and enabling the barrier to withstand water levels above its primary height.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The gripping structures feature curved or angled surfaces that better interact with flowing water and debris forces. The curved geometry distributes hydraulic loads more effectively compared to flat sand bag surfaces, improving resistance to overturning moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Reliability

If sand bag walls are used for flood protection, then they provide some barrier function, but they become structurally weakened, to the point of failure, when saturated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier functionVSAvoidstructural strength when saturated
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier panels are constructed from materials with controlled porosity and hydrophobic properties. These material parameter changes allow the structure to manage water saturation differently - either by repelling water or by accommodating saturation without losing structural integrity, unlike sand bags that weaken when wet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier system uses composite construction combining water-resistant materials with structural reinforcement elements. This composite approach creates a structure that maintains strength even when exposed to water, unlike homogeneous sand bag constructions that fail when saturated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

5Reliability

If modular units are connected end-to-end to form a flood barrier wall, then protection is provided, but the units are bulky, cumbersome to erect and disassemble, and require substantial space for storage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection providedVSAvoidbulky and cumbersome to erect and disassemble
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier is segmented into compact, standardized panels with optimized dimensions for handling and storage. Each panel is divided into manageable size segments that can be easily transported, erected, and stored, reducing the bulk and complexity issues associated with large monolithic barriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connection mechanisms are designed to operate at similar elevation levels, allowing panels to be connected horizontally without significant vertical lifting or positioning adjustments. This equipotential connection approach simplifies erection and disassembly operations compared to multi-level assembly requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modular system effectively resists lateral displacement and structural failure under flood conditions, offering durable, lightweight, and easy-to-assemble protection that can be reused for multiple years, reducing storage and disposal costs.

Implementation Method 1

When the barrier units are placed on a surface such as soil or sand, and filled with ballast, the barrier units may sink downwardly so that the mud, sand or the like from such surface enters the channels of the barrier units

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

the mud, sand or the like from such surface enters the channels of the barrier units and engages their gripping elements to prevent lateral displacement in response to forces exerted by flood water and debris

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10774489B1Flood mitigation system
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 LJ YODOCK & ASSOC LLC
  • US10774489B1 patent drawing
  • US10774489B1 patent drawing
  • US10774489B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flood mitigation system comprises a number of barrier units connected end-to-end to form a flood barrier wall wherein each individual barrier unit includes gripping structure along a bottom wall to resist dislocation when impacted by flood water and floating debris and a seal is placed on an end wall of each barrier unit so that the barrier wall resists leakage of flood water between adjacent units.