Modular Food Slicing System With Adjustable Longitudinal Beams
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing food cutting systems are complex and costly to set up and convert, as they require different machines for cutting food bars of varying lengths, leading to inefficiencies and high costs.
Innovation Solution
A modular food cutting system comprising a first and second high-performance slicer, with identical inlet and cut-out modules, and adjustable transport tapes and gripper guides, allowing for easy adaptation to different food bar lengths without the need for complete machine exchange.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If different food slicing machines are designed for different food bar lengths, then slicing efficiency is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The food slicing machine is divided into separate modular components: an infeed unit, a slicing unit, and a longitudinal beam. These modules can be independently configured and combined with different conveyor belt lengths to accommodate various food bar lengths, eliminating the need for completely different machine designs.
Solution Approach 2:
The infeed unit and slicing unit are designed as universal components that can be used across multiple machine configurations. By keeping these core functional units identical and only varying the conveyor belt and longitudinal beam lengths, the system achieves multi-functionality for different food bar lengths while reducing manufacturing complexity.
2Adaptability or versatility
If different food slicing machines are designed for different food bar lengths, then adaptation to varying lengths is improved, but manufacturing cost and time increase
Solution Approach 1:
The machine is segmented into standardized modules with only the longitudinal beam and conveyor belt varying by length. This allows the infeed and slicing units to be manufactured once and reused across different configurations, significantly reducing manufacturing cost and time.
Solution Approach 2:
Instead of redesigning entire machines for different food bar lengths, only specific parameters (conveyor belt length and longitudinal beam length) are changed. This parameter-based adaptation approach maintains manufacturing efficiency while achieving versatility.
3Adaptability or versatility
If the entire food slicer is replaced to convert production line to different food bar lengths, then adaptability is improved, but loss of time and productivity during conversion increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system is designed with dynamic reconfigurability, allowing the longitudinal beam and conveyor belt to be easily exchanged while keeping the core slicing mechanism in place. This enables quick conversion between different food bar lengths without complete machine replacement, minimizing production downtime.
4Area of stationary object
If transport distance on production line is shortened to fit space constraints, then space utilization is improved, but adaptability to different food bar lengths deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The system accommodates different food bar lengths by changing only the conveyor belt and longitudinal beam parameters, allowing compact space utilization while maintaining adaptability. The modular design enables precise length adjustment without requiring additional space.
Data Source
Figure 1
AI summary
A system (100) having a first foodstuff slicing machine (1) and a second foodstuff slicing machine (2) is proposed, wherein the foodstuff slicing machines (1, 2) have identical input modules (1.2, 2.2) and identical slicing modules (1.3, 2.3), wherein the input modules (1.2, 2.2) and slicing modules (1.3, 2.3) of the foodstuff slicing machines (1, 2) are spaced apart from one another by longitudinal members (1.5, 2.5) with different lengths. A method for producing a system (100) and a method for equipping a production line (200) are also proposed.