Modular Footbed Assembly With Arch Cookie for Cushioning Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional footbeds suffer from issues such as inadequate cushioning, support, and durability, particularly in terms of maintaining shape and providing comfort, due to the use of inexpensive materials or expensive co-molded composites, which also increase manufacturing costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A modular footbed design featuring a semi-rigid arch cookie and elastomeric foam layer, where the arch cookie can be coupled or decoupled from the foam layer, allowing for customizable support and comfort levels, and reducing manufacturing costs by using separate manufacturing streams for the foam and arch components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If inexpensive foam is used for footbeds, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but cushioning capability and durability deteriorate quickly due to compression set

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidcushioning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The footbed is divided into multiple functional layers: a top cover layer, a cushioning layer with through-holes, and a support layer with arch support elements. Each layer performs a specific function, allowing the inexpensive foam to be enhanced with targeted support structures that prevent compression set while maintaining cost-effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The footbed combines multiple materials including foam with through-holes, fabric top cover, and rigid support elements (such as arch supports made from different materials). This composite structure provides both the cushioning of foam and the durability of more rigid materials, resolving the contradiction between cost and performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If standard flat foam footbeds are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but comfort and pressure reduction are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The footbed incorporates local variations in structure and material properties: arch support elements in the arch region, cushioning layers in high-pressure areas, and through-holes strategically positioned to reduce pressure points. This localized enhancement of comfort features maintains manufacturing simplicity while significantly improving overall comfort

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The footbed transitions from a flat two-dimensional structure to a three-dimensional form with multiple layers, varying thicknesses, and elevated support elements. This dimensional enhancement provides better contouring to the foot and improved pressure distribution without complicating the manufacturing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If co-molded insoles are used to provide customized support, then foot support performance is improved, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot support performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The footbed is segmented into separate manufacturing components (top cover, cushioning layer with through-holes, support layer with arch elements) that can be manufactured independently using simpler processes, then assembled together. This segmentation maintains customized support performance while reducing manufacturing complexity compared to co-molding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If molded foam footbeds are used to maintain shape, then durability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The footbed structure is segmented so that only critical support elements (arch supports, heel counters) are molded from rigid materials for durability, while the majority of the footbed uses simpler foam construction. This selective molding approach maintains shape and durability where needed while controlling manufacturing costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The footbed combines molded rigid support elements with non-molded foam and fabric layers. This composite construction provides the durability and shape retention of molded materials in critical areas while using more cost-effective materials for the remainder of the footbed structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modular design provides enhanced comfort and stability while allowing for cost-effective production and flexible supply planning, enabling manufacturers to choose footbed configurations based on shoe style and price point without altering manufacturing processes or shoe fit.

Implementation Method 1

The one or more protrusions having a negative draft angle to keep the semi-rigid arch cookie against a base of the elastomeric foam layer or wherein the interlocking is provided by the one or more protrusions having a notch with a widened base into which the semi-rigid arch cookie snaps

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 2

an elastomeric foam layer having a rear foot region, a midfoot region and a front foot region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4164446B1Modular footbed assemblies and method of manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 INSITE PERFORMANCE LLC
  • EP4164446B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4164446B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4164446B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An arch cookie includes a heel portion, a pair of arch supports extending from the heel portion toward a toe region, the pair of arch supports being of unequal length, the heel portion and the pair of arch supports being continuous, and at least one window disposed in at least one of the heel portion and the pair of arch supports.