Modular Foreline Layout for Flexible Vacuum Line Reconfiguration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing foreline systems in semiconductor fabrication plants lack flexibility and standardization, making them difficult to maintain, repair, and configure efficiently, which can lead to inconsistent vacuum performance across process chambers.

Innovation Solution

A modular foreline system composed of standard components, including straight and bent segments, which can be easily connected and configured to form a continuous foreline, allowing for independent heating control and incorporation of additional components like traps and reactors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional non-modular foreline systems are used, then installation is straightforward, but flexibility and ease of reconfiguration are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The foreline system is divided into multiple modular segments that can be independently configured and connected. Each segment contains standardized components (pipes, bends, heaters, traps, reactors) that can be assembled in different configurations to meet varying process requirements, thereby improving flexibility without significantly increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular segments are designed with universal interfaces and standardized dimensions, allowing the same basic components to serve multiple functions and be reused across different foreline configurations. This universality enables easy reconfiguration while maintaining manageable system complexity through component standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of repair

If custom-designed forelines are used, then performance can be optimized, but maintenance and repair difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance easeVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the foreline into standardized modules with uniform connection interfaces, maintenance personnel can easily isolate, remove, and replace specific segments without affecting the entire system. This modular approach simplifies maintenance while the standardized design ensures consistent performance across all segments through precise manufacturing specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular design enables individual segments to be independently replaced when needed, allowing damaged or worn components to be quickly discarded and replaced with standardized replacement segments. This approach maintains performance consistency while significantly improving maintenance ease compared to custom-designed monolithic forelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of operation

If modular components are used, then reconfiguration ease improves, but connection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereconfiguration easeVSAvoidconnection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

All modular segments utilize universal connection interfaces with standardized dimensions, sealing methods, and mounting patterns. This universality allows segments to be connected in any sequence or configuration without requiring different connection mechanisms, thereby easing reconfiguration while keeping connection complexity manageable through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The connection interfaces across all modular segments are designed to be homogeneous in terms of geometry, sealing approach, and fastening mechanism. This homogeneity simplifies the reconfiguration process by eliminating the need to learn or adapt to different connection types, while the standardized design prevents connection complexity from escalating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

4Reliability

If heating is applied to foreline segments, then vacuum performance improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum performanceVSAvoidheating energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Heating elements are integrated into specific modular segments where they are most needed based on local thermal requirements, such as segments prone to condensation or located in colder environments. This localized heating approach maintains reliable vacuum performance in critical areas while minimizing overall energy consumption by avoiding unnecessary heating of the entire foreline system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The heating system is segmented and distributed across multiple independent modular units, each with its own heating control. This allows selective activation of heating in specific segments based on real-time vacuum performance requirements, optimizing the balance between maintaining reliable vacuum conditions and minimizing energy consumption by heating only when and where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12288696B2Modular foreline system
Publication Date: 2025.04.29 EDWARDS LTD
  • US12288696B2 patent drawing
  • US12288696B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A kit of parts for forming a foreline for coupling a process chamber to a vacuum pumping and/or abatement system, the kit comprising: a plurality of foreline segments; wherein each foreline segment is a pipe that comprises: a first substantially straight end portion; a second substantially straight end portion opposite to the first end portion; and an intermediate portion disposed between the first and second end portions and connected to the first and second end portions by respective bends; the first and second end portions are substantially parallel to each other; the intermediate portion is oblique to the first and second end portions; and the foreline segments are configured to be attached together so as to form a continuous foreline.