Modular Frame Rail Reinforcement for Impact-Resistant Doors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-panel doors face challenges in meeting impact rating criteria and resisting high wind loads while maintaining an aesthetic appearance, as existing reinforcement methods are either unsightly or require complex manufacturing processes and inventory management.

Innovation Solution

A modular frame rail system with interchangeable reinforcement modules that can be slidably attached to the frame rails, providing varying levels of structural reinforcement as needed, allowing for a single type of frame rail to be used across different panels with different reinforcement modules added during assembly based on design loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If thicker cross-section or stronger material frame members are used to meet impact rating criteria and resist high wind loads, then the structural strength is improved, but the aesthetic appearance is negatively affected and the weight is substantially increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The frame member is divided into a base frame member and separate reinforcement members that can be independently selected and attached. This segmentation allows the base frame to maintain aesthetic appearance while reinforcement members provide the necessary structural strength to meet impact rating criteria and resist high wind loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reinforcement members are selectively applied to specific portions of the frame where additional strength is needed based on local load requirements. This allows different regions of the frame to have different structural properties, with reinforcement concentrated in areas experiencing higher loads while maintaining aesthetic appearance in visible areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If different types of frame members with different structural properties are used to accommodate different design loads, then the adaptability is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and inventory management are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different design loadsVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single base frame member design serves multiple functions by accommodating different reinforcement members through standardized attachment mechanisms. This universal base frame can be used across all panels, while the reinforcement members are selectively added based on specific load requirements, reducing the need for multiple specialized frame types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The frame system transitions from a static, fixed configuration to a dynamic, configurable system where reinforcement members can be selectively attached or removed based on changing design requirements. This allows the same base frame to adapt to different load conditions without requiring different manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If add-on structural reinforcement such as steel struts are used, then the structural strength is improved, but the aesthetic appearance is degraded and the number of visible fasteners is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement members are integrated with the base frame member through standardized attachment mechanisms that combine structural function with aesthetic consideration. The reinforcement members are designed to attach in a way that minimizes visible fasteners and maintains a sleek appearance, merging the structural reinforcement function with the aesthetic requirements of the full view door design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240060356A1Modular barrier panel frame reinforcement systems and methods
Publication Date: 2024.02.22 OVERHEAD DOOR CORP
  • US20240060356A1 patent drawing
  • US20240060356A1 patent drawing
  • US20240060356A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A frame rail for a movable barrier includes a top side, a bottom side, a front side, and a rear side. A first module connector is formed on the rear side. The first module connector extends continuously along a length of the frame rail and is configured to slidably receive a corresponding second module connector of a module. The frame rail has a continuous cross-section with the first module connector integrally formed with the top, bottom, front, and rear sides. One of the first or second module connectors comprises a groove and the other of the first or second module connectors comprises a tongue configured for receipt within the groove. The first module connector is configured to slidably receive the second module connector from a longitudinal end surface of the frame rail.