Modular Frame Workstation Assembly for Tool-Free Reconfiguration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing benching systems face challenges such as being wobbly and lacking quality due to minimal components, requiring complex assembly with tools, limited reconfigurability, and inability to adapt for different workstation needs like converting workstations to seating.

Innovation Solution

A reconfigurable benching system with a simplified core frame structure and additional components that can be easily assembled and disassembled without tools, allowing for various configurations to meet optimal space requirements, including face-to-face workstation arrangements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If benching systems are designed with minimal component parts for easy assembly, then assembly complexity is reduced, but the resulting assemblies become wobbly and lack quality look and feel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly complexityVSAvoidassembly stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The benching system is divided into modular components including leg members, top members, and cross members that can be independently manufactured and assembled. Each component has standardized connection interfaces that simplify assembly while maintaining structural integrity through proper distribution of connection points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Connection features such as slots, holes, and mounting surfaces are pre-formed during manufacturing of individual components. This preliminary preparation of connection interfaces eliminates the need for complex field assembly operations while ensuring precise alignment and stable connections when components are put together.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If benching systems include a large number of components and mechanical linkages for high quality look and feel, then assembly stability is improved, but assembly complexity increases requiring multi-step assembly and specialized tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly stabilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple connection functions are integrated into single components. For example, leg members incorporate both vertical support and horizontal connection capabilities, while cross members provide both structural bracing and mounting surfaces for accessories, reducing the total number of parts needed while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Components are designed with universal connection interfaces that can accommodate multiple assembly configurations and accessory attachments. The standardized slots and mounting points on leg and top members allow the same components to serve multiple functions including structural support, accessory mounting, and reconfigurable workstation arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If benching systems use many specialized components and mechanical linkages, then quality look and feel and accessory support are improved, but reconfigurability is discouraged due to system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality look and feelVSAvoidreconfigurability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The benching system incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable elements such as movable cross members, adjustable top member positions, and repositionable accessory mounts. These dynamic features allow the system to be easily reconfigured for different workstation arrangements while maintaining a consistent quality appearance through standardized components and connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Universal connection interfaces and standardized component designs enable the same set of parts to be arranged in multiple configurations. The leg members, top members, and cross members can be repositioned and reconnected to create different workstation layouts without requiring specialized or configuration-specific components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If known benching systems are designed for specific workstation configurations, then initial assembly is simplified, but adaptability for different workstation needs is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial assembly simplicityVSAvoidconfiguration adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into independent, standardized modules that can be assembled in various sequences and configurations. This modular approach allows the same components to be arranged for different workstation needs while maintaining simple assembly procedures through consistent connection methods across all modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The benching system incorporates adjustable and reconfigurable elements such as movable cross members, adjustable top member positions, and repositionable accessory mounts. These dynamic features allow the system to be easily reconfigured for different workstation arrangements while maintaining a consistent quality appearance through standardized components and connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11317716B2Frame type workstation configurations
Publication Date: 2022.05.03 STEELCASE INC
  • US11317716B2 patent drawing
  • US11317716B2 patent drawing
  • US11317716B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A furniture assembly comprising a first frame structure having front and rear portions and including at least a first leg member and a substantially horizontal first rail member supported by the at least a first leg member where the first rail member has a first length dimension, a substantially horizontal second rail member supported by the at least a second leg member spaced apart from the first rail member wherein an assembly space includes the space between the first and second rail members, a front portion of the assembly space adjacent the front portion of the first frame structure and a rear portion of the assembly space adjacent the rear portion of the first frame structure, a first furniture sub-assembly having first and second ends, having a first depth dimension and supported within the assembly space by the first and second rail members and a second furniture sub-assembly having first and second ends, a second depth dimension and supported within the assembly space by the first rail member and a rail member of another frame structure, wherein the combined first and second depth dimensions are less than the first length dimension.