Modular Frames for Geometric Solids

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current educational devices lack the ability to securely and interactively demonstrate the collective effects of multiple geometric solids in three-dimensional arrangements, failing to provide adequate support and safety for instructional purposes.

Innovation Solution

A modular frame system comprising vertex saddles and edge struts that can be reversibly coupled to securely hold and orient geometric solids, allowing for the formation of complex structures and easy reconfiguration to accommodate different shapes and sizes, while also providing protection and interactive exploration of their interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If modular components are used to form complex three dimensional structures, then adaptability and versatility are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into modular components including vertex saddles, edge struts, and face plates that can be independently assembled and disassembled. Each component has a specific function (vertex support, edge protection, face coverage) and can be combined in various configurations to create different geometric structures, thereby improving adaptability while managing complexity through standardized interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular components are designed with universal features such as standardized connection mechanisms that allow the same components to be used across multiple different geometric configurations. The vertex saddles, edge struts, and face plates can be reconfigured to support various polyhedral shapes, making the system versatile without requiring entirely different components for each structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If supportive material is placed between interactive elements, then structural support is improved, but interactivity is worsened due to potential interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidinteractivity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The supportive material is applied locally only where structurally necessary - specifically on the outer surfaces of the modular components rather than filling the entire internal volume. This localized application provides structural support while leaving the internal spaces open, allowing interactive elements to move and interact freely without obstruction from excessive supportive material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2919876B1Modular frames for arrangement and orientation of geometric solids
Publication Date: 2020.12.30 HARAMEIN NASSIM
  • EP2919876B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2919876B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP2919876B1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

Modular frames for instructional use that provide secure mounts for geometric solids are presented. Some contemplated modular frames can be assembled into three dimensional modular devices and are particularly suitable for instructional purposes. Modular devices comprising two or more frames could be coupled via a clip in two or more different configurations. Containers including conductive material and configured to provide a Faraday cage around their contents are also provided.