Modular I-Beam Framing Assembly for Low-Labor Structural Connections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current modular structural framing systems are costly, labor-intensive, and require specialized equipment and field fabrication, limiting their structural strength and adaptability, particularly for applications like photovoltaic panel installations.

Innovation Solution

A modular structural framing system featuring unique I-beam structural members and brackets that minimize the need for field fabrication, using thru bolts and U-clamps for easy assembly and connection, allowing for adaptable and scalable designs suitable for various applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If field fabrication techniques (welding, drilling, riveting) are used to assemble structural framing systems, then structural strength and connection reliability are improved, but installation labor intensity and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidinstallation labor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The structural framing system is divided into modular components (I-beam structural members, brackets, connectors) that can be pre-fabricated and assembled through simple mechanical connections rather than requiring field welding or drilling. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and assembled quickly on-site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Connection brackets and structural members are pre-fabricated with integrated connection features (such as pre-drilled holes, built-in connection plates, or attachment mechanisms) before delivery to the site. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for field fabrication activities like welding, drilling, or riveting during installation, reducing labor intensity while maintaining structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If specialized equipment and multiple tradesmen (welders, iron workers, concrete finishers) are deployed for assembly, then structural security and connection reliability are improved, but installation costs and project duration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection reliabilityVSAvoidassembly equipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The structural members and connectors are designed with self-aligning and self-securing features that allow installation by general laborers without requiring specialized tradesmen. Connection brackets incorporate features such as self-centering mechanisms, friction-fit interfaces, or simple bolt-down connections that do not require welding skills or specialized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functions (structural support, connection, alignment, and securing) are merged into single integrated components. For example, connection brackets combine attachment, alignment, and load-transfer functions into one element, eliminating the need for separate components and the specialized labor required to assemble multiple discrete parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If numerous hardware components (nuts, bolts, connector plates) are used to achieve structural connections, then connection strength and structural integrity are improved, but assembly complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection strengthVSAvoidassembly speed
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple hardware components are merged into single integrated connection brackets or built-in connection features on the I-beam members themselves. This reduces the number of discrete parts (nuts, bolts, separate connector plates) that need to be handled and assembled, thereby increasing assembly speed while maintaining connection strength through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Connection brackets are designed as universal components that can accommodate various connection scenarios and load conditions without requiring different hardware types. A single bracket design can serve multiple connection points and structural configurations, reducing the variety and quantity of hardware needed while maintaining adequate connection strength across different applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If standard hot-rolled structural I-beams are used with minimal design modification, then material availability and cost are improved, but adaptability to different functions and foundations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial availabilityVSAvoidfunctional adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The I-beam structural members and connection brackets are designed as universal, modular components that can be configured for different structural applications (photovoltaic mounting, signage, canopies, etc.) and various foundation types without requiring custom fabrication. Standardized connection interfaces and adjustable bracket positions enable the same basic components to adapt to different functional requirements while using readily available standard I-beam materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8291653B2Modular structural framing system
Publication Date: 2012.10.23 UNIRAC INC
  • US8291653B2 patent drawing
  • US8291653B2 patent drawing
  • US8291653B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention generally relates to a modular, structural framing system.