Modular Freight Terminal Layout for Decentralized Parcel Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional logistics systems face inefficiencies due to the need for centralized cargo hubs, leading to increased costs, handling errors, shipment misidentification, and inflexible delivery times, which result in delayed deliveries and potential damages during transit.

Innovation Solution

A reconfigurable decentralized shipping system utilizing unmanned handling units that securely manage and transfer freight container modules, enabling real-time address changes and efficient sorting, thereby reducing the reliance on centralized hubs and minimizing handling errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a centralized cargo hub is established to pool and sort shipments, then shipping efficiency is improved, but construction costs and operational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshipping efficiencyVSAvoidcargo hub complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized cargo hub into multiple decentralized freight terminals distributed across different locations. Each terminal independently handles local sorting and consolidation, eliminating the need for a single large complex hub while maintaining shipping efficiency through distributed operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the sorting and consolidation functions from the centralized cargo hub and relocates them to decentralized freight terminals. This extraction reduces the complexity of any single facility while distributing the workload across multiple locations, thereby maintaining productivity without requiring a massive centralized infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Speed

If fast sorting is performed at the cargo hub to meet tight time frames, then transit efficiency is enhanced, but handling errors and shipment damages increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting speedVSAvoidhandling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fast sorting process into multiple smaller sorting operations distributed across various freight terminals. Each terminal performs sorting at a slower, more careful pace, reducing errors while collectively achieving efficient transit through parallel processing at multiple locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary sorting and consolidation at decentralized freight terminals before shipments reach the final destination. This preliminary action reduces the urgency and speed requirements at any single location, allowing for more careful handling while maintaining overall transit efficiency through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If repeated identification work is performed during parcel transit, then routing accuracy is improved, but error accumulation and troubleshooting costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidtroubleshooting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs identification and routing determination at decentralized freight terminals before shipments are consolidated and transported. This preliminary action establishes accurate routing information early in the process, reducing the need for repeated identification checks and minimizing error accumulation during subsequent transit stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual handling is used for parcel offloading and relocating, then flexibility in handling non-standard packages is improved, but labor costs and delivery time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling flexibilityVSAvoiddelivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated handling systems at decentralized freight terminals that can independently manage standard and non-standard packages. These self-service systems reduce reliance on manual labor while maintaining flexibility through programmable handling capabilities, thereby reducing both labor costs and delivery time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Adaptability or versatility

If a single parcel is used as the shipping unit, then customer service flexibility is improved, but identification errors and stacking instability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice flexibilityVSAvoidstacking stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual parcels into consolidated freight units at decentralized terminals. This merging maintains customer service flexibility by allowing individual parcel tracking and routing while improving stacking stability through standardized container designs that securely hold multiple items together during transit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12190276B2Mobile reconfigurable modular electronic freight terminal and freight container module thereof
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 MINTRON ENERGY TECH CO LTD
  • US12190276B2 patent drawing
  • US12190276B2 patent drawing
  • US12190276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An unmanned handling unit for a reconfigurable decentralized shipping system operates whereby a shipper first selects a freight container module of one of a plurality of sizes to pack at least one item, and then ships it to a predetermined target; the shipper inputs shipping information to the shipping system; when the shipper and/or the predetermined target modifies the shipping information, delivery is modified in real time. The reconfigurable decentralized shipping system includes a plurality of transport means operating in respective operating areas and configured with at least one unmanned handling unit, each of the operating areas including a plurality of freight terminal staging points and at least intersected with at least another one of the operating areas.