Modular Fuselage Spine Layout for Rigidity and CG Adjustment
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Aircrafts face challenges in achieving rigidity to avoid aeroelastic resonance while being lightweight and cost-effective, with a need for improved flight control, durability, and reduced manufacturing complexity.
Innovation Solution
Aircraft design incorporating a spine structure from tail to nose with modular components that can be detachably attached and positioned to achieve a desired center of gravity, using a computing device to adjust module positions based on weight information for optimal balance.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Strength
If a traditional monolithic fuselage structure is used, then structural rigidity is achieved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The fuselage is divided into multiple modular sections that can be independently manufactured and then assembled together using connection elements. Each module maintains structural integrity while allowing for simplified manufacturing processes and reduced overall complexity compared to a monolithic structure.
2Device complexity
If modular sections are used, then manufacturing complexity is reduced, but structural rigidity may be compromised
Solution Approach 1:
Multiple modular sections are connected through robust connection elements that integrate the individual modules into a unified structural system. The connection elements are designed to maintain structural continuity and rigidity across module boundaries, ensuring that the assembled fuselage achieves the required structural performance.
3Device complexity
If fixed module positions are used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but adaptability for different flight missions is reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The module positioning system allows for dynamic adjustment of module locations along the fuselage. Connection elements are designed with degrees of freedom or adjustable mechanisms that enable modules to be repositioned based on different flight mission requirements, optimizing the center of gravity and structural configuration for specific operational tasks.
4Stability of the object's composition
If multiple connection elements are used for module attachment, then module stability is improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
Connection elements are designed with multi-functional capabilities, serving both structural attachment purposes and module positioning functions. The universal connection elements can accommodate different module configurations and attachment requirements through a single standardized interface, reducing the variety of connection components needed while maintaining stability.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems, devices, and methods including: a spine spanning from a tail portion to a nose portion of an aircraft, wherein the spine is configured to provide rigidity to the aircraft; and one or more modules configured to be detachably attached to the spine, wherein the one or more modules are configured to be movable on the spine to obtain a desired center of gravity for the aircraft.