Modular Grain Cracker System with Automated Roller Gap Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing grain cracking systems require manual adjustments by skilled operators, leading to human errors, inefficiencies, and inconsistencies in producing grains that meet desired specifications, as they lack automated continuous adjustment capabilities based on real-time product characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A modular grain cracking system that includes a motor, PLC, and an external optimization unit, allowing for continuous and automatic adjustment of the gap between rollers based on characteristics like moisture content and temperature, using sensors and a roller drive system to ensure accurate and frequent adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual adjustment by operators is used, then the system can be operated with simple equipment, but the adjustment frequency is limited and human errors occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment frequencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses sensors to automatically detect roller gap conditions and triggers adjustments without human intervention. The motor-driven adjustment mechanism operates autonomously based on sensor feedback, eliminating the need for manual operator intervention while maintaining simple overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated motor-driven system. The motor responds to sensor signals to automatically adjust the roller gap, substituting human-operated mechanical systems with automated electromechanical systems to increase adjustment frequency while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If skilled operators perform measurements and adjustments, then product specifications can be met, but the system depends on skilled workers and is prone to human errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment accuracyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor the roller gap and provide feedback to the control system. This automated feedback loop replaces manual measurement and adjustment by skilled operators, ensuring consistent accuracy while increasing automation. The sensor data directly triggers motor-driven adjustments when threshold values are exceeded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated system performs self-monitoring and self-adjustment through sensors and motor mechanisms. The system detects when adjustment is needed and executes the adjustment autonomously, eliminating dependence on skilled workers while maintaining or improving adjustment accuracy through consistent sensor-based detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If the gap between rollers is adjusted frequently, then product characteristics can be optimized, but the adjustment cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct specification complianceVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor-based feedback system continuously monitors roller gap conditions and triggers adjustments only when necessary, based on predefined threshold values. This approach maintains high manufacturing precision by ensuring adjustments occur when needed, while minimizing unnecessary adjustments that would consume time and resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs adjustments periodically based on sensor-triggered conditions rather than continuously or manually at fixed intervals. This condition-based periodic action optimizes product characteristics by adjusting when quality thresholds are approached, while reducing overall adjustment frequency compared to manual monitoring, thereby minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20240189827A1Modular system for a grain cracker and a grain cracking system and method
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 BUNGE SA
  • US20240189827A1 patent drawing
  • US20240189827A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention refers to a modular system for a grain cracker, and a grain cracking system and method that generates cracked grains within a predetermined specification. The modular system comprises a motor (124); a PLC (134); and an external optimization unit (136) to drive the motor (124), based on an adjustment point (A). The grain cracking system (100) comprises: rollers (110); and a programmable logic controller, PLC (134), configured to: obtain an adjustment point (A), and control the gap between the rollers (110) from the obtained adjustment point (A). The grain cracking method comprises the steps of: obtaining (510) an adjustment point; controlling (520) the gap between the rollers; and altering (530) the adjustment point, should the characteristics of the cracked grains coming from the rollers not be compliant with the desired specifications, wherein the step of altering the adjustment point is performed continuously and automatically.