Modular Gripper System for Handling Robot Arms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gripper systems for handling robots are inflexible and struggle to adapt to differently shaped or sized objects, leading to inefficient handling and potential deflections in objects like thin, heavy plates.

Innovation Solution

A modular gripper system with a connection module and interchangeable holding modules, featuring polygonal interfaces and mechanically/pneumatically actuated locking units, allowing for easy reconfiguration and secure gripping of various objects using vacuum suction cups or actuated elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional grippers with fixed gripping fingers or vacuum suction cups are used, then the gripper can hold simple or small objects, but it cannot adapt to differently shaped or sized objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to differently shaped objectsVSAvoidgripper structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gripper is divided into a connecting carrier and multiple interchangeable holding modules. Each holding module can be independently attached or detached, allowing the gripper system to be reconfigured for different object geometries without redesigning the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The standardized polygonal interfaces (second interfaces on connecting carrier, third interfaces on holding modules, fourth interfaces for module-to-module connection) enable a universal connection system. The same holding modules can be used with different connecting carriers, and modules can be chained together in various configurations to handle diverse objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple holding modules are arranged to adapt to object geometry, then gripping flexibility improves, but the number of components and assembly complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripper configuration flexibilityVSAvoidnumber of modules and interfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The gripper system is segmented into standardized holding modules that can be independently configured. Each module has identical third interfaces that can connect to second interfaces on the connecting carrier or to third interfaces on other holding modules, enabling flexible assembly without increasing interface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The polygonal cross-section parameter (square or hexagonal) is standardized across all modules. This geometric parameter allows the modules to be arranged in various patterns (straight, circular, star-shaped) while maintaining simple, identical connection interfaces, thus achieving configuration flexibility without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If holding modules are connected in series to reach distant gripping points, then coverage area increases, but gaps between modules may reduce gripping precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripper coverage areaVSAvoidgripping position precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The gripping surface is segmented into multiple holding modules that can be arranged contiguously. The polygonal interfaces are designed so that modules connect face-to-face, eliminating gaps between adjacent gripping surfaces and maintaining precision across the entire coverage area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modules can be arranged in two-dimensional patterns (circular, star-shaped, or custom configurations) rather than just linear sequences. This allows the gripper to cover larger areas while keeping module connections tight and gap-free, as modules can be positioned adjacent to each other in multiple directions from a central point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables flexible adaptation to diverse object geometries, prevents deflections in heavy plates, and ensures secure gripping by allowing for optimal arrangement of holding elements, improving handling efficiency and stability.

Implementation Method 1

gripping or holding elements designed as vacuum suction cups can be used to hold plate-shaped objects very easily and effectively

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentEP4474113A1Gripper system for an arm of a handling robot and handling robot
Publication Date: 2024.12.11 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP4474113A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4474113A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4474113A1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3d

AI summary

The invention relates to a gripper system (10) for an arm (1) of a handling robot (100), comprising a connecting carrier (12) having a first interface (22) configured to be connected to the arm (1) of the handling robot (100), and several second interfaces (33) arranged on the connecting carrier (12) in the area of ​​a connection module (25), each configured to be connected to a holding module (30), wherein each holding module (30) has a third interface (46) for interacting with a second interface (33) of the connection module (25) and at least two fourth interfaces (48) configured to be connected to a third interface (46) of a holding module (30), and wherein at least some of the holding modules (30), preferably all holding modules (30), have gripping or holding elements (35).