Modular Hanging Storage Frame Without Fixed Track Installation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hanging storage systems for artwork are large, require multiple skilled installers, and are challenging to relocate due to their fixed nature and reliance on track systems, which can be costly and damaging to uneven surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A modular, free-standing, trackless hanging storage system with a lower frame structure, upper frame structure, guidance tube, and panels that are easy to assemble and disassemble, using roller and guide assemblies for adjustable and customizable storage solutions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If conventional hanging storage units are fixed to walls and ceilings to ensure structural integrity, then stability is improved, but damage to installation spaces and complexity of installation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoiddamage to installation spaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a free-standing frame structure as an intermediary element that provides structural support without requiring attachment to walls or ceilings. The frame acts as a self-supporting intermediary that bears the weight of stored items through its own structural integrity, eliminating the need for wall/ceiling mounting and thus preventing damage to installation surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The hanging storage system is designed to be self-supporting through its free-standing frame structure, which derives stability from its own geometry and construction rather than external attachments. The system serves itself by using the frame's inherent structural properties to maintain stability without requiring installation on permanent surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If conventional units run on a track system to enable movement, then accessibility is improved, but complexity of the system and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidtrack system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the track system entirely from the design, extracting this complex mechanical component and replacing it with a simpler free-standing frame structure. The shelves are directly supported by the frame without requiring tracks, rollers, or other moving mechanism components, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical track system with a static free-standing frame structure. Instead of using mechanical tracks with rollers or sliding mechanisms to enable access, the system uses a stable frame that allows direct approach and access to shelves from the front, substituting a complex mechanical movement system with a simpler structural approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Stability of the object's composition

If conventional units are designed for structural integrity with multiple components, then stability is improved, but ease of assembly and disassembly worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidease of assembly and disassembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the hanging storage system into modular segments including a frame structure with multiple adjustable shelves. Each shelf and frame component is designed as a separate module that can be easily assembled and disassembled through simple connection mechanisms, allowing the system to maintain structural integrity while being straightforward to put together and take apart.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Quantity of substance

If conventional units are large in size to provide storage capacity, then storage capability is improved, but space utilization efficiency and ease of relocation worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage capacityVSAvoidrelocation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the hanging storage system with dynamic characteristics by making it a free-standing unit that can be easily relocated. The frame structure and shelves are configured to provide adequate storage capacity while maintaining a size and weight that allows for easy movement and repositioning within different spaces, adapting to various installation locations as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9962020B2Modular hanging storage system
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 YOUNG NELSON B
  • US9962020B2 patent drawing
  • US9962020B2 patent drawing
  • US9962020B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hanging storage unit is provided. The hanging storage unit includes a lower frame structure including at least one roller assembly, an upper frame structure including at least one guide assembly, a plurality of posts coupled at a lower end to the lower frame structure and coupled at an upper end the upper frame structure, a guidance tube, moveably engaged with one of the at least one guide assembly, and a panel, an upper end of the panel attached to the guidance tube and a lower end of the panel moveably engaged with one of the at least one roller assembly.