Modular Heat Exchanger Headers for Rapid Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing heat exchangers face challenges such as lengthy manufacturing times due to numerous weldings or brazings, complex maintenance and cleaning processes, limited flexibility in size and capacity production, and reliability issues with liquid leakage and flow rate pressures, particularly when used in applications beyond the automotive industry.

Innovation Solution

A heat exchanger design featuring modular headers with removable dome-shaped modular members and partitions that allow for easy assembly and disassembly, enabling quick adaptations in size and capacity, and the use of various materials like copper, aluminum, and steel, with improved sealing and structural strength through gaskets and a thin metal strengthening plate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If U-shaped pipe unions and welding/brazing are used to connect tubes, then fluid connection between tube rows is achieved, but manufacturing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid connection reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The header is divided into modular components: a support structure with tube-receiving apertures and removable cover members that can be independently assembled and disassembled. This segmentation eliminates the need for welding/brazing U-shaped unions between tubes, as tubes are simply inserted into the modular header sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The complex welding/brazing process for creating U-shaped pipe unions is extracted and replaced by a simpler insertion mechanism. Tubes are taken out from the requirement of being welded into unions and are instead directly received by the modular header apertures, significantly reducing manufacturing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If rigorous testing of weldings/brazings is performed, then leak-resistance and strength are verified, but manufacturing time and equipment requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding qualityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The design uses removable cover members sealed with gaskets instead of permanent welded joints. This allows for simpler, less time-consuming testing procedures since the modular construction with elastomeric seals inherently provides leak resistance without requiring the complex pressure testing and inspection needed for welded joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If copper materials are used for tubes and unions, then ease of welding is achieved, but weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding easeVSAvoidheat exchanger weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The modular header design with removable cover members and gasket seals is universally applicable to different tube materials (copper, aluminum, steel) without requiring material-specific welding expertise. This universal connection method eliminates the need to choose copper specifically for welding ease, allowing selection of lighter, cheaper materials like aluminum while maintaining ease of assembly through the modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Weight of moving object

If aluminum tubes are used instead of copper, then weight and cost are reduced, but welding and brazing difficulties increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetube weightVSAvoidjoint fabrication ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical welding/brazing system is replaced with a mechanical insertion and sealing system. Aluminum tubes are simply inserted into the modular header apertures and sealed with elastomeric gaskets, eliminating the need for difficult aluminum welding or brazing operations while maintaining connection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Ease of operation

If complete disassembly is performed for maintenance, then cleaning access is achieved, but maintenance complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning accessVSAvoiddisassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The header is segmented into removable cover members that can be independently accessed and removed. This allows maintenance personnel to access specific tube rows for cleaning without disassembling the entire heat exchanger, reducing both the complexity and time required for maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The header transitions from a fixed, permanent construction to a dynamic, reconfigurable structure with removable covers. This dynamic design allows the header to be easily opened and closed for maintenance operations, providing cleaning access while maintaining operational integrity when assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

6Stability of the object's composition

If headers are rigidly sized for specific heat exchanger sizes, then structural fit is achieved, but adaptability to different sizes is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheader structure stabilityVSAvoidsize adaptation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The header is segmented into modular support sections and removable cover members that can be independently configured. This allows the same modular components to be assembled in different quantities and arrangements to accommodate various heat exchanger sizes and capacities while maintaining structural stability through standardized connection interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular header components are designed as universal parts that can serve multiple configurations. The same support structure with standardized apertures and cover members can be adapted to different heat exchanger sizes by simply adjusting the number and arrangement of modular sections, eliminating the need for custom-sized headers for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2096399B1Heat exchanger with modular headers
Publication Date: 2011.03.16 REFRION
  • EP2096399B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2096399B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

The present invention refers to a heat exchanger provided with modular headers. A heat exchanger, in particular of the finned-pack type, made according to the present invention comprises a plurality of tubes (1) that extend between a plurality of hollow interspaces (2); at least a header (4) comprising a support (5) provided with a plurality of first apertures (6) adapted to accommodate an extremity region (7, 8) of the tubes (1); and a cover (9) associated to said support (5). The heat exchanger is characterized in that each one of said support (5) and said cover (9) comprises a plurality of modular members (10, 18) that are removably associated to each other by means of conjugate surfaces (11a, 11b; 19a, 19b).