Grow system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydroponic systems face challenges such as high manual labor costs, waste production, pest management issues, inflexibility, nutrient level degradation, oxygen saturation problems, and limited data collection, leading to inefficient food production and inability to diversify crop types.

Innovation Solution

A hydroponic grow system incorporating a mobile robot, low flow plumbing, centralized processing, and scheduling/monitoring software, with features like one-way nutrient supply, maximum oxygen saturation, and modular automation that allows for flexible crop management and data collection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional farming methods are used, then vast amounts of space are required, but the system becomes inefficient and dependent on weather

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood production efficiencyVSAvoidfarming space
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from traditional two-dimensional ground farming to three-dimensional vertical farming by stacking grow modules vertically. This allows multiple layers of crops to be grown in a compact vertical space, dramatically increasing production efficiency per unit area while eliminating weather dependence through controlled indoor environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the fundamental parameters of farming by moving from soil-based to hydroponic cultivation, controlling temperature, humidity, and nutrient delivery precisely. This allows optimal growth conditions to be maintained regardless of external weather conditions, improving productivity while reducing space requirements through efficient vertical stacking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If ground farming is used, then vast space is required, but farmers must traverse the space to provide care, increasing labor costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop care efficiencyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The farming system is segmented into modular grow units that can be independently managed. Each module contains its own irrigation, lighting, and monitoring systems, allowing farmers to care for specific sections rather than traversing entire fields. This modular approach reduces labor requirements while the vertical stacking provides structural efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical traversal and care provision with automated systems including robotic arms for planting and harvesting, automated irrigation systems, and sensor networks for monitoring. This substitution eliminates the need for farmers to physically traverse the farming space, reducing labor costs while the modular vertical structure maintains structural efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If soil farming is used, then farmers need extensive experience to manage water, but improper water management causes plant damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater managementVSAvoidplant health
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The hydroponic system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor water levels, nutrient concentrations, and plant root conditions. This feedback is transmitted to a control system that automatically adjusts water and nutrient delivery, eliminating the need for farmer experience while ensuring optimal plant health through precise, real-time management of cultivation parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to self-regulate water and nutrient delivery based on sensor feedback. The automated irrigation system responds to plant needs without human intervention, making water management foolproof while maintaining reliable plant health through consistent, precise delivery of appropriate water amounts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Extent of automation

If traditional manufacturing equipment is purchased to reduce labor costs, then automation increases, but the equipment becomes very expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask automationVSAvoidequipment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of purchasing expensive traditional manufacturing equipment, the system segments automation into simple, specialized modules tailored for agricultural tasks. Basic robotic arms for planting and harvesting, automated irrigation systems, and sensor networks provide sufficient automation at lower cost by focusing on specific agricultural functions rather than general-purpose expensive equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach to automation by using simple, affordable components with automated control logic rather than expensive traditional manufacturing equipment. The modular vertical structure enables basic automation mechanisms to be more effective and cost-efficient, achieving adequate automation levels without the high costs of conventional equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Productivity

If current hydroponic systems are used, then water is recirculated, but nutrient levels degrade and waste is produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefood production efficiencyVSAvoidnutrient loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the water management approach from recirculation to a controlled flow-through system. Fresh nutrient-rich water is continuously supplied to each grow module, and used water is drained and replaced. This parameter change prevents nutrient degradation and contamination that occur in recirculating systems, eliminating waste while maintaining high production efficiency through consistent nutrient availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system reduces labor costs, minimizes waste, enhances oxygen availability, supports diverse crop growth, and provides granular data for improved production efficiency, enabling flexible and efficient plant growth management.

Implementation Method 1

a separation mechanism configured to provide an air gap between the top cover and the membrane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir gap oxygen transfer: Aeration

Implementation Method 2

The local buffer is configured to continuously provide water to the growing tray on demand

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentUS11457578B2Grow system
Publication Date: 2022.10.04 HIPPO HARVEST INC
  • US11457578B2 patent drawing
  • US11457578B2 patent drawing
  • US11457578B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A grow system. The system includes growing plants in grow modules that are individually moveable. The plants grow in trays where roots never touch the water supply. The plumbing to the grow modules is a low flow, one way flow continual drip system that is hands free. A mobile robot can navigate around a growspace, bring any grow module from one location to another, and perform growspace operations. The growspace is a control space with data source zones and a control space manager. The control space manager can collect data and control different variables across different data source zones in order to determine optimal policies and conditions for data source growth and generation.