Modular Medical Imaging System Power Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical imaging systems, particularly endoscopic cameras, face compatibility issues due to varying camera technologies, requiring frequent updates and replacements of Camera Control Units (CCUs) to support new camera technologies, leading to increased costs and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A modular medical imaging system with a control module that is compatible with multiple input modules, allowing for efficient updates and reconfiguration, enabling backwards and forwards compatibility with existing and future technologies, and allowing input modules to default to a powered-on state when disconnected, facilitating seamless connection and disconnection without resetting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a CCU is designed to support multiple camera technologies, then compatibility is improved, but hardware complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera technology compatibilityVSAvoidCCU hardware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into separate functional modules: a control module that handles camera control and a display module that handles image processing and display. This segmentation allows each module to be optimized independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining compatibility across multiple camera technologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control module is designed with universal functionality to support multiple camera technologies through a standardized interface. It can control various camera types (analog, digital, HD, SD) without requiring hardware changes, achieving multi-functionality through software and standardized protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a CCU is updated to support new camera technologies, then adaptability is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenew camera technology supportVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The control module employs dynamic software that can be updated and reconfigured to support new camera technologies. This allows the system to adapt to new cameras through software updates rather than hardware replacements, reducing costs while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses configurable parameters and settings that can be adjusted to accommodate different camera technologies. By changing software parameters rather than hardware components, the system can support new cameras at minimal cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If a CCU is reconfigured to work with new camera technology, then compatibility is improved, but time and labor requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera technology compatibilityVSAvoidreconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control module includes automatic detection and configuration capabilities that reduce manual reconfiguration efforts. When a new camera is connected, the system can automatically detect its parameters and adjust settings, minimizing the time and labor required for compatibility adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Weight of moving object

If camera head electronics are separated from processing circuitry, then camera head size and weight are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecamera head weightVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The electronics that would increase camera head weight are extracted and relocated to the control module. This separation reduces camera head weight while the control module, which is not part of the moving camera head, handles the processing functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

A standardized interface and communication protocol act as an intermediary between the simplified camera head and the control module. This intermediary enables the separated components to work together seamlessly, managing the system architecture complexity through standardized connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP2749203B1Single power switch for modular medical imaging system
Publication Date: 2019.03.13 KARL STORZ IMAGING INC
  • EP2749203B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2749203B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP2749203B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A modular video imaging system, and more particularly, a modular video imaging system having a control module connectable to multiple input modules. The control module and each input module having its own power supply and the input modules each capable of receiving differing types of image data from different types of cameras and processing the image data into a format recognizable by the control module. The control module controlling the ON/OFF condition of the input modules, such that each input module can be connected and disconnected during use.