Modular Input Tracking for Customizable XR Controllers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current XR controllers are cumbersome and inflexible, as they often integrate tracking and communication sub-systems with input devices, making them complex and difficult to customize for various applications, and are not suited to track non-computing physical objects effectively.

Innovation Solution

A modular input system decouples tracking and communication sub-systems from input devices, allowing a separate input movement tracking device to be used with multiple input devices, including non-computing physical objects, and incorporates capacitive sensors for customizable touch and proximity sensing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If tracking and communication sub-systems are integrated with input devices, then functionality is provided, but device complexity increases and customization becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the input device into separate functional modules: the input device itself and the tracking/communication sub-systems. This segmentation allows each component to be independently designed, manufactured, and customized without increasing overall system complexity, directly resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking and communication sub-systems are designed as universal components that can be paired with multiple different input devices. This multi-functionality approach allows the same tracking sub-system to work with various input devices, reducing the need for complex integrated designs while maintaining versatility across different applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If integrated controllers are used, then tracking functionality is provided, but the system becomes inflexible and difficult to update

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic, reconfigurable system where tracking sub-systems can be selectively paired with different input devices based on application requirements. This dynamic architecture enables flexible updates and reconfigurations without requiring complete system redesign, thereby improving adaptability while managing integration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking and communication sub-systems are pre-configured and standardized before being paired with input devices. This preliminary preparation allows for easier updates and modifications to individual components without affecting the entire integrated system, enhancing flexibility while reducing the complexity of system-wide changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If tracking sub-systems are built into each controller, then tracking is enabled, but cost and mass increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking capabilityVSAvoiddevice mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the tracking and communication sub-systems from the input device and positions them as separate, optional components. This extraction reduces the mass of the primary input device while maintaining full tracking capability when needed, as the tracking sub-system can be added only when required for specific applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of embedding heavy tracking hardware in every input device, the patent uses a centralized tracking sub-system that can service multiple input devices. This copying approach allows the tracking functionality to be shared across multiple devices, reducing the overall mass and cost per device while maintaining reliable tracking capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Ease of manufacture

If standardized controllers are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but customization for various applications becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidapplication-specific customization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the controller system into standardized base input devices and customizable tracking/communication modules. This segmentation allows the base input devices to be manufactured using simplified standardized processes, while customization is achieved by pairing them with different configured tracking modules, thus maintaining both manufacturing simplicity and application-specific adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11847267B2Input device tracking systems
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US11847267B2 patent drawing
  • US11847267B2 patent drawing
  • US11847267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example in accordance with the present disclosure, an input movement tracking device is described. The input movement tracking device comprises a tracking device housing and a connector to mechanically attach the tracking device housing to an input device. The input movement tracking device also includes an electrical connector to receive input from the input device to be transmitted to a host computing device. A tracking system disposed within the tracking device housing tracks a position and orientation of the tracking device housing and the input device in physical space and a transceiver disposed within the tracking device housing communicates with the host computing device.