Modular Insect Barrier Device for By-Catch Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for controlling invasive species like the spotted lanternfly are ineffective in preventing by-catch of birds and mammals, are not modular or reusable, and are not suitable for urban and suburban environments due to aesthetic concerns and durability issues.

Innovation Solution

A modular, chain-like insect barrier device that can be easily deployed around tree trunks to protect insect-trapping tape from birds and mammals, featuring interchangeable links that can be customized for various tree sizes and shapes, and are designed to withstand weather conditions and easy to manufacture.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If adhesive tape is used to trap lanternflies, then insect control effectiveness is improved, but by-catch of birds and mammals increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsect control effectivenessVSAvoidby-catch of birds and mammals
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A modular barrier device serves as an intermediary structure that protects the adhesive tape from being directly accessed by birds and mammals. The barrier includes a protective cage or enclosure that allows lanternflies to contact the adhesive while preventing birds and mammals from reaching the tape, thus eliminating by-catch while maintaining insect control effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier device is divided into modular segments that can be assembled around tree trunks of varying sizes. Each segment acts as a protective unit that encloses the adhesive tape, creating a segmented protective structure that prevents by-catch while maintaining the trapping function for lanternflies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If unitary construction is used for tree protection, then structural simplicity is improved, but adaptability to different tree sizes and shapes deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to different tree sizes and shapes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier device is divided into modular segments that can be assembled around tree trunks of varying sizes. Each segment acts as a protective unit that can be connected to form a complete barrier, allowing the same basic design to adapt to different tree diameters and shapes while maintaining structural simplicity through standardized connection mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular design allows the barrier to be dynamically adjusted by adding or removing segments based on the specific tree size and shape. This dynamic configurability enables the same barrier type to adapt to various tree dimensions without requiring custom-designed unitary structures for each scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If flexible materials are used to wrap around trees, then ease of installation is improved, but durability against weather and animal interference deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoiddurability against weather and animal interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier is constructed from rigid modular segments that can be easily installed around trees and connected together. These rigid segments provide superior durability against weather and animal interference compared to flexible materials, while the modular nature allows for straightforward installation by simply connecting segments around the tree trunk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier device combines rigid materials for structural durability with appropriate connection mechanisms that facilitate easy installation. The composite construction uses robust materials resistant to weather and animal damage while incorporating features like interlocking segments or simple fastening systems that enable straightforward installation without specialized equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If robust construction is used to withstand weather, then reliability is improved, but ease of manufacture and cost-effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewithstand weather conditionsVSAvoidease of manufacture and cost-effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The robust barrier is divided into standardized modular segments that can be manufactured independently using cost-effective processes. Each segment is designed with simple geometries and standard connection interfaces that facilitate easy manufacturing and assembly, allowing robust weather-resistant construction without requiring complex, expensive unitary structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The modular design allows individual segments to be replaced or recovered as needed, reducing overall manufacturing costs. Damaged segments can be replaced without replacing the entire barrier, and standardized segments can be manufactured using efficient, cost-effective processes while maintaining robust construction quality throughout the structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The modular design effectively reduces by-catch, allows for easy deployment and customization, and is durable enough for use in urban and suburban areas, enabling effective invasive species control while maintaining a low profile and being cost-effective.

Implementation Method 1

tree tape with an outer, adhesive edge has been found to be effective for trapping these insects as they crawl up the trunks of hardwood trees

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS20240099292A1Modular Insect Barrier Device
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 KOPS ZACHARY
  • US20240099292A1 patent drawing
  • US20240099292A1 patent drawing
  • US20240099292A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A modular insect barrier device is disclosed within which forms a protective barrier over an insect-attracting adhesive in order to prevent by-catch. Various embodiments of the invention may be configured for preferred purposes, including but not limited to ease and economy of manufacture; a more complete barrier against insect encroachment; optional incorporation of a flexible wrap which yet further protects the tree while supporting the linked chain of the modular insect barrier device; and, to allow for user-customizable design by the exchange of one configuration of links for another or incorporation of adornments to the structure herein.