Modular Automated Inspection With Preconfigured Imaging Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated inspection technologies are inefficient and costly due to complexity, requiring skilled personnel and dedicated hardware, making them unsuitable for low-cost or low-margin parts, and often result in imprecise results due to manual configuration and sub-optimal image capture settings.

Innovation Solution

A universal inspection system with a modular design incorporating illumination devices, sensors, and articulating arms, allowing for intuitive configuration using pre-computed inspection parameters, enabling efficient inspection of various parts with minimal downtime and training, and capable of adapting to different products without significant reconfiguration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual inspection is used, then inspection can be conducted without specialized equipment, but inspection accuracy and consistency deteriorate due to human error and fatigue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically determining inspection parameters, illumination settings, and capture conditions without requiring skilled personnel to manually configure the system. The processing device autonomously analyzes part geometry and optimizes inspection settings based on pre-computed parameters stored in the database.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Inspection parameters, illumination settings, and capture conditions are pre-computed and stored in a database before actual inspection occurs. When a part is inspected, the system retrieves and applies these pre-optimized parameters, eliminating the need for real-time manual configuration and ensuring consistent high-quality results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If dedicated inspection hardware is used, then inspection precision is improved, but system cost and complexity increase making it unsuitable for low-margin parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection precisionVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system is designed with universal components that can inspect multiple types of parts across different industries. The modular architecture with interchangeable illumination devices, sensors, and articulating arms allows a single system to perform various inspection tasks, eliminating the need for dedicated expensive hardware for each specific inspection application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves different inspection capabilities by changing software parameters and configuration settings rather than requiring different physical hardware. By adjusting illumination parameters, sensor settings, and inspection algorithms, the same physical system can be optimized for inspecting diverse parts with varying requirements, significantly reducing overall system cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If complex automated inspection systems are used, then inspection precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates requiring skilled personnel for configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection precisionVSAvoidease of configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically determining inspection parameters, illumination settings, and capture conditions without requiring skilled personnel to manually configure the system. The processing device autonomously analyzes part geometry and optimizes inspection settings based on pre-computed parameters stored in the database.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A database serves as an intermediary between the complex inspection hardware and the user, storing pre-computed inspection parameters and optimization algorithms. This intermediary layer translates complex technical requirements into automated configuration processes, shielding users from the underlying complexity while maintaining high inspection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If manual configuration of inspection parameters is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but inspection efficiency and image capture quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Inspection parameters, illumination settings, and capture conditions are pre-computed and stored in a database before actual inspection occurs. When a part is inspected, the system retrieves and applies these pre-optimized parameters, eliminating the need for real-time manual configuration and ensuring consistent high-quality results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts multiple parameters including illumination intensity, sensor exposure settings, capture resolution, and articulating arm positioning based on the specific part being inspected. This automated parameter optimization significantly improves inspection efficiency and image quality without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3224806B1Automated inspection
Publication Date: 2024.06.05 KITOV SYST
  • EP3224806B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3224806B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3224806B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Systems, methods, and related technologies for automated inspection are described. In certain aspects, one or more images of a reference part can be captured and the one or more images of the reference part can be processed to generate an inspection model of the reference part. One or more regions of the inspection model can be associated with one or more analysis parameters. An inspection plan can be generated based on the inspection model and the one or more analysis parameters. Based on the inspection plan, one or more images of a part to be inspected can be captured and the one or more images of the part can be processed in relation to the analysis parameters to compute one or more determinations with respect to the part. One or more outputs can be providing based on the one or more determinations.