Modular Interlocking Panels for Large-Capacity Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current large-capacity holding containers are costly and time-consuming to manufacture, transport, and assemble, require special components that cannot be locally procured, have inflexible installation footprints, and are not scalable or resistant to microbial degradation when buried underground.

Innovation Solution

A modular holding container system using pre-formed, interlocking panels that can be easily assembled and disassembled, with a load-bearing, curved wall design resistant to microbial degradation, allowing for flexible sizing and shape variations, and constructed from materials like plastic and wood derivatives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional large-capacity holding containers are manufactured and transported to installation sites, then they can provide storage capacity, but they are costly and time-consuming to manufacture, transport, assemble and disassemble

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidtime to manufacture and transport
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The holding container is divided into multiple modular panels that can be independently manufactured and assembled on-site. Each panel is a discrete unit that can be produced locally and quickly assembled together to form the complete container structure, eliminating the need to transport large pre-assembled containers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The panels are pre-formed with interlocking features and curved configurations during manufacturing, but remain compact for transport. At the installation site, these pre-prepared panels are quickly assembled into the final container structure, combining advance preparation with rapid on-site deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional holding containers use fixed-size components, then they can be manufactured, but they have a fixed, inflexible installation footprint and size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in installation footprintVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The container is segmented into standardized modular panels that can be assembled in different configurations. By varying the number and arrangement of these identical modular units, containers of different sizes and footprints can be created from the same basic component set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The same standardized panel design serves multiple purposes and can be used to create containers of various sizes and shapes. These modular panels are universal components that can be reconfigured for different installation footprints and storage capacities without requiring custom-manufactured parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If traditional holding containers are buried underground, then they can be concealed, but they are subject to microbial or biological degradation or degradation due to the alkalinity of the earth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to microbial degradationVSAvoidmicrobial and biological degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The panels are constructed from composite materials that combine the structural properties needed for load-bearing walls with chemical resistance to microbial and alkaline environments. This composite construction allows the container to be buried underground while protecting against biological degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If traditional holding containers use heavy curved steel wall components, then they can provide structural strength, but they are cumbersome and difficult to handle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strength of wallVSAvoidease of handling
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The heavy curved steel wall is segmented into multiple lighter panels that can be individually handled and assembled. Each panel maintains the necessary structural strength through its curved design and material properties, but the segmentation makes them manageable for transport and installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The panels incorporate curved geometries that provide structural strength while being lighter than traditional heavy steel walls. The curvature distributes loads effectively and allows the panels to be formed from lighter materials that are easier to handle and assemble.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentUS11059666B2Large-capacity modular holding container and related methods
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 NPK ACCESS SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US11059666B2 patent drawing
  • US11059666B2 patent drawing
  • US11059666B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A holding container includes a plurality of pre-formed, releasably interlocking, load-bearing panels configured to form an at least partially curved, load-bearing wall extending around the perimeter of at least one storage area capable of containing at least 100,000 gallons of liquids, solids or a combination thereof. At least one among the width and length of each panel is less than 102 inches in a non-load-bearing state.